Adam and Eve had two sons

“Adam and Eve had two sons: the elder of them was named Cain; which name, when it is interpreted, signifies a possession: the younger was Abel, which signifies sorrow. They had also daughters.

Now the two brethren were pleased with different courses of life: for Abel, the younger, was a lover of righteousness; and believing that God was present at all his actions, he excelled in virtue; and his employment was that of a shepherd.

But Cain was not only very wicked in other respects, but was wholly intent upon getting; and he first contrived to plough the ground.

He slew his brother on the occasion following:

They had resolved to sacrifice to God. Now Cain brought the fruits of the earth, and of his husbandry; but Abel brought milk, and the first-fruits of his flocks.

But God was more delighted with the latter oblation, when he was honoured with what grew naturally of its own accord, than he was with what was the invention of a covetous man, and gotten by forcing the ground; whence it was that Cain was very angry that Abel was preferred by God before him; and he slew his brother, and hid his dead body, thinking to escape discovery.

But God, knowing what had been done, came to Cain, and asked him what was become of his brother, because he had not seen him of many days; whereas he used to observe them conversing together at other times. But Cain was in doubt with himself, and knew not what answer to give to God.

At first he said that he was himself at a loss about his brother’s disappearing; but when he was provoked by God, who pressed him vehemently, as resolving to know what the matter was, he replied, he was not his brother’s guardian or keeper, nor was he an observer of what he did.

But, in return, God convicted Cain, as having been the murderer of his brother; and said, “I wonder at thee, that thou knowest not what is become of a man whom thou thyself hast destroyed.”

God therefore did not inflict the punishment [of death] upon him, on account of his offering sacrifice, and thereby making supplication to him not to be extreme in his wrath to him; but he made him accursed, and threatened his posterity in the seventh generation.

He also cast him, together with his wife, out of that land. And when he was afraid that in wandering about he should fall among Wild beasts, and by that means perish, God bid him not to entertain such a melancholy suspicion, and to go over all the earth without fear of what mischief he might suffer from wild beasts; and setting a mark upon him, that he might be known, he commanded him to depart.


And when Cain had travelled over many countries, he, with his wife, built a city, named Nod, which is a place so called, and there he settled his abode; where also he had children.

However, he did not accept of his punishment in order to amendment, but to increase his wickedness; for he only aimed to procure every thing that was for his own bodily pleasure, though it obliged him to be injurious to his neighbours.

He augmented his household substance with much wealth, by rapine and violence; he excited his acquaintance to procure pleasures and spoils by robbery, and became a great leader of men into wicked courses.

He also introduced a change in that way of simplicity wherein men lived before; and was the author of measures and weights. And whereas they lived innocently and generously while they knew nothing of such arts, he changed the world into cunning craftiness.

He first of all set boundaries about lands: he built a city, and fortified it with walls, and he compelled his family to come together to it; and called that city Enoch, after the name of his eldest son Enoch. …


Lamech [the fifth lineal descendant from Cain] … because he was so skilful in matters of divine revelation … knew he was to be punished for Cain’s murder of his brother [and] made that known to his wives.

Nay, even while Adam was alive, it came to pass that the posterity of Cain became exceeding wicked, every one successively dying, one after another, more wicked than the former.

They were intolerable in war, and vehement in robberies; and if anyone were slow to murder people, yet was he bold in his profligate behaviour, in acting unjustly, and doing injuries for gain.”

Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities of the Judahites, Book 1, Chapter 1-2, Section 1-2

Josephus here gives a succinct narrative of the Murder of Abel and the Curse of Cain.

Proud Judahite Josephus coined the term “Judaism” in order to pit it against Hellenism. To delineate the Judahites‘ language, poetry, religion, art, manners, customs, institutions from Hellenism, which had by his time overwhelmed the Classical World: Hellenism as the antithesis of “Hebraism.”

The early Christians eagerly seized upon the name using it as a teaching tool to help describe biblical conditions. “The Jews” themselves intensely detested Josephus because he was a Judahite and not a “Jew,” and his works were about Judahite history, and so revealed the truth, True Israel‘s true history, and exposed “The Jews'” great imposture.

“The Jews” refrained from reading his works, which remained largely unknown to them. It was only in comparatively recent times, after “The Jews” – primarily Ashkenazim – became familiar with modern Christian literature, that they began calling their religion “Judaism.”

In other words, it was part of “The Jews'” re-branding agenda and Great Impersonation; to convince the Christian World that they – False Israel – were True Israel.

When reading modern translations of both Josephus and the Holy Bible, care must be taken to read either “Judahites” or “Judeans” where the text renders “Jews.” Modern translators, in Josephus’s case William Whiston, were gullible Christians who foolishly believed that the Massorete Jews were honest scribes and swallowed their semantic tricks hook, line, and sinker. In short, they make no distinctions among the designations, and so facilitate “The Jews'” modern masquerade as True Israel.



“This I wanted to say for the strengthening of our faith; for the Jews will not give up their pride and boasting about their nobility and lineage. As was said above, their hearts are hardened. Our people, however, must be on their guard against them, lest they be misled by this impenitent, accursed people who give God the lie and haughtily despise all the world.

For the Jews’ would like to entice us Christians to their faith, and they do this wherever they can. If God is to become gracious also to them, the Jews, they must first of all banish such blasphemous prayers and songs, that boast so arrogantly about their lineage, from their synagogues, from their hearts, and from their lips, for such prayers ever increase and sharpen God’s wrath toward them.

However, they will not do this, nor will they humble themselves abjectly, except for a few individuals whom God draws unto himself particularly and delivers from their terrible ruin. The other boast and nobility over which the Jews gloat and because of which they haughtily and vainly despise all mankind is their circumcision, which they received from Abraham.

My God, what we Gentiles have to put up with in their synagogues, prayers, songs, and doctrines! What a stench we poor people are in their nostrils because we are not circumcised! Indeed, God himself must again submit to miserable torment if I may put it thus as they confront him with inexpressible presumption, and boast:

“Praised be Thou, King of the world, who singled us out from all the nations and sanctified us by the covenant of circumcision!”

And similarly with many other words, the tenor of all of which is that God should esteem them above an the rest of the world because they in compliance with his decree are circumcised, and that he should condemn all other people, just as they do and wish to do. In this boast of nobility they glory as much as they do in their physical birth.

Consequently I believe that if Moses himself would appear together with Elijah and their Messiah and would try to deprive them of this boast or forbid such prayers and doctrine, they would probably consider all three of them to be the three worst devils in hell, and they would be at a loss to know how to curse and damn them adequately, to say nothing of believing them.

For they have decided among themselves that Moses, together with Elijah and the Messiah, should endorse circumcision, yes, rather that they should help to strengthen and praise such arrogance and pride in circumcision, that these should, like themselves, look upon all Gentiles as awful filth and stench because they are not circumcised. Moses, Elijah, and the Messiah must do an that they prescribe, think, and wish.

They insist that they are right, and if God himself were to do other than they think, he would be in the wrong.”

Martin Luther (1483 – 1546), On the Jews and Their Lies, Part I (1543), translated by Martin H Bertram

Luther spent over three decades interacting with, and attempting to proselytise “The Jews.” He did so believing the Massorete lie that “The Jews” were biblical Judahites. His intimacy with the Jewish insurgency in Western Europe ultimately lead to his utter abhorrence of “The Jews'” lowly spiritual condition and ultimate agenda to subvert and destroy Christendom. Hence his polemic On the Jews and Their Lies.

Here highlighting “The Jews” as perennial boasters, filled with self-pride and a loathing for greater mankind; especially of their “nobility and lineage.” Boasts and self-pride, their “boast of nobility,” founded upon the Great Impersonation and lies, lying, deception, Gaslighting, and lashings of chutzpah.

In the Book of Genesis we learn that when Cain was born, Eve thinking he was the promised seed said, “I have gotten a man from the Lord” (Gen. 4:1). A great misapprehension, because later she was woefully disappointed. Abel soon followed whose name signifies “vanity.” Eve believing she had the promised seed in Cain, whose name signifies “possession,” was so taken up with him that another son appeared vanity to her.

The two brothers matured very differently, each had a calling: Cain “contrived to plough the ground” and Abel was a shepherd. The religious worship of God was a new invention and the offerings of Cain and Abel were different.

Cain showed a proud, unbelieving heart because his offering was an “invention of a covetous man, and gotten by forcing the ground.” Therefore he and his offering were rejected. God was honoured by Abel’s offering “with what grew naturally of its own accord,” because it showed he came as a sinner, and by his sacrifice expressing humility, sincerity, and believing obedience.

Abel offered in faith, and Cain did not. Also, Cain did not offer the “first fruits,” instead offering Yahweh the second-best, keeping the best for himself: a miserly characteristic typical and distinctive of his posterity. … the “Kenites.”


By acknowledging his Original Sin and Primal and Personal Karma, Abel sought the benefit of the New Covenant of Mercy through the promised Seed, and his sacrifice reflected this and so God accepted it. Yet, although God’s acceptance of Abel’s offering did not change the birthright, and make it his, Cain was roused to great anger.

Cain’s innate nature, his prideful bearing, wrathful mind, and malicious heart would not let the matter rest; Malice in the heart ends in murder by the hands. Thus, the inwardly raging Cain slew Abel, his younger brother, his own mother’s son, whom he ought to have loved and protected; a good brother, who had never done him any wrong. The impenitent Cain even tried to conceal his dark deed from God, covering a deliberate murder with a deliberate lie.

In the moral universe blood calls for blood, the blood of the murdered for the blood of the murderer. But, Yahweh does not exact this terrible price from Cain. Instead He places a curse on Cain and his progeny. Cain was cursed from the earth, where he chose his portion, and set his heart, and so God made it his punishment.

The works of Evil and the consequence of Primal and Personal Karma makes of situations a comfort or a cross to bear, a blessing or a curse. Innate sinful and wicked natures bring a curse upon all they do, and all they have.

When found out and sentenced Cain complains not of his sin, but of his punishment, which showed Cain’s much hardened heart to be more concerned about his suffering than his great sin. Expelled from Eden together with his wife:

“he was afraid that in wandering about he should fall among Wild beasts, and by that means perish, God bid him not to entertain such a melancholy suspicion, and to go over all the earth without fear of what mischief he might suffer from wild beasts; and setting a mark upon him, that he might be known, he commanded him to depart.”


Yahweh pronounced a curse upon Cain, and he was condemned to be a “fugitive and a wanderer” on the Earth, a mark being set upon him “lest any finding him should kill him.”

The enigmatic “mark of Cain” (Gen. 4:15) was a brand of infamy on Cain, and a token from God that others should not kill him. It was not a mark upon his physical body, but a certain sign that protected him from vengeance, though of what kind it is impossible to determine.

Cain was exiled from Eden and settled in the land of Nod, and built a city, which he named after his son Enoch. His many descendants are enumerated together with the their remarkable inventions. “Nod” means, “shaking,” or “trembling,” and alludes to Cain’s spiritual restlessness and unease; reference to the land of a “vagabond.”

Cain’s wicked race prospered each generation becoming more worldly, more carnal and wicked, as well as most clever and industrious. Cain was a father of shepherds, and a father of musicians, but not a father of the faithful. His progeny looked to the world and not the Divine; they learned how teach about brass and iron, and not to teach the good knowledge of God: invented devices to become rich, and how to be powerful, and how to be merry; but nothing of God, of his fear and service.

Cain’s wicked race continued through the ages, race-mixing all the while, and appeared variously in the biblical narrative, especially as “Kenites,” and Canaanites.


“The Jews” are False Israel impersonating True Israel and so perforce arrogate a “Semitic” ancestry. One of the most audacious rabbinical claims is that the Jewish people are the exclusive descendants of Abraham based on Gen. 12:3.

“And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”


“The Jews”and “Judaeo-Christians” routinely use this passage to imply that if all non-Jews do not “bless” the Jewish people they will not be blessed. The Christian Zionist Death Cult is particularly fond of it; using its as their fundamental argument in support of the Zionist Entity established on stolen, ethnically cleansed, Palestinian land.

That such and an audacious lie is believed is a salient example of the Great Impersonation and Judaising of Christianity Agenda‘s success. A great win for the Jewish Myth-makers; a wonderful example of “The Jews'” dark, Kabbalistic magic, of “mystic Judaism,” of Reversing Reality.

Yet, when stepping outside “The Jews'” created reality and seeing the Jewish Myth for what it is, a fabulous deception, and “The Jews” for what they are, an impostor people, clarity is quickly restored; and reality soon comes into view.

“The Jews”and “Judaeo-Christians” position is based purely on lies, lying, hypocrisy, deception, deliberate mistranslation, and audacity. “The Jews” and “Judaeo-Christians” routinely use deliberately flawed exegeses to pull off their scam.

The Gen. 12:3 Yahweh Blessing is conditional and specific to a particular bloodline: the Abrahamites. Being a conditional, it behooves non-Abrahamites to bless Abraham if these non-Abrahamites wish to be blessed.

The passage does not mention, reference, or imply “The Jews.” This is because not only was Abraham and is posterity not Jews but also “The Jews” had not been invented then, their arrival in the historical narrative was at a much later date.

Nowhere in Scripture is Abraham identified with the Jewish people. Also, if the Jewish Myth was actually real and Abraham was a “Jew,” such an identification is an anachronism meaning that Abraham, being the great-grandfather of Judah (the fourth son of Jacob/Israel) cannot be named after any of his descendants. Judah was an Abrahamite, but Abraham was not an Israelite, and certainly not a Judahite. No great-grandfather has ever been named after his great-grandson.

Abraham was the Abrahamites’ patriarch not Judah, the father of the Judahites whose identity “The Jews” have stolen

Nowhere in Scripture are the Israelites ever called “Jews,” and no such statement in either Testament that says, for example, “Jacob is a Jew” or “Israel is a Jew,” or even “Judah is a Jew,” the supposed patriarch of “The Jews.”

An example of the Jewish Myth‘s deception but inherent contradiction is this: II Kings 16:6 refers to the House of Judah as“Jews,” but it refers to the House of Israel as “Israel.” If “The Jews” are True Israel why does this passage contradict them?

The word “Jew‟ is a modern invention that does not mean biblical “Judah,‟ “Israel‟ or “Abraham.‟ All such claims are deceptions invented by the rabbis for the express purpose of deceiving Christians, and by that the world.

Part of the Jewish sleight of hand semantics, and Jewish Myth-makers‘ legerdemain to “hoodwink” the Christian Bible translators to accept their deceptive words as true; that “Jew” is “Judahite,” or “Judaean,” and “Gentile,” is “non-Jew,” for example.


The Yahweh Blessing put upon Abraham is this:

“Now [Yahweh] had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:  And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”

Gen. 12:1-3


Anyone with a semblance of historical understanding would see that this blessing does not apply to the Jewish people. “The Jews'” claim that the blessings of Gen. 12 apply to them is simply false. An audacious claim since the Bible says no such thing.

Briefly, the reality is this:

  • Yahweh promised to make a “great nation” out of Abraham. While Abraham’s name become “great,” conversely “The Jews” have always been a greatly despised people throughout history; even by their own admissions. “The Jews” always lament how they have been “unjustly persecuted” by every nation in which they have dwelt.
  • Abraham had a total of eight sons by three wives: Ishmael by Hagar, Isaac by Sarah; and six sons by Keturah, after Sarah died. These six sons were named Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak and Shuah (Gen. 25:1). All of these eight sons were Abrahamites and not Jews.
  • Yahweh promised  “in thee shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.” An obvious contradiction between what is said about Abraham and “The Jews.” The fact is that the Jewish people have always been despised wherever they have gone; and have been routinely and repeatedly expelled from cities and nations throughout history. “The Jews” have never been regarded as a “blessing,” on the contrary, they have always been considered a curse and a pestilence wherever they have chosen to live.
  • Judaeo-Freemason President Harry S. Truman ensured that America was the first nation in the world to recognise the Zionist Entity, the Zionist State of Israel. Judaeo-Freemasonry/Organised Jewry enslaved America was the first to “bless” the “Israelis” and has increasingly “blessed” them ever since via massive financial, military and diplomatic support: the giant host nation providing life-giving sustenance to a tiny parasite nation. What are the blessings and thanks received in kind? “The Jews'” piss and black, bitter bile poured upon the Christian nation: creating crises, chaos, massive debts, subterfuge, treason, and endless war. The once great Christian nation has precipitously declined morally, spiritually, economically, religiously, and even intellectually because it is blessing the WRONG PEOPLE.


From the above we can conclude that there are only two possibilities:

  • “The Jews” are lying about who they are
  • The “blessings” of Gen. 12:3 are false


Of course, it is the first that is true.


“The Jews” trace their supposedly exclusive “Semitic” or “Shemite” descent from Abraham; another of their audacious lies.

All of Abraham’s eight male descendants are Shemites, as they are his direct descendants. His son Ishmael had twelve sons of his own; and these sons became known to the world as the Arabs. Isaac was a Shemite as well as Keturah’s six sons, yet “The Jews” never acknowledge this; never admit that the Abrahamic “great nation” exists, and it is not them.

The Jewish assertion that only “The Jews” are included in the context of Gen. 12:3 is an audacious lie. “The Jews'” version of the Bible is inherently inconsistent, contradictory, and when using the whole counsel of God, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. In other words, it is self-serving nonsense, promoted as genuine Scripture by the rabbinical death cult. The rabbis have made this doctrine, and many others, up out of nothing, in their Talmudic yeshivas of sophistry; “The Jews'” schools of brainwashing, indoctrination, and subversion.

The Ahrimanic-inspired, rabbinic-created Talmud is a mish-mash of fabulous stories, wild fantasies, deceptive tales, and anti-God, anti-Christ and anti-human sentiment. It is the Jewish Myth‘s inspiration and Pharisaism‘s bedrock.


The “blessings” of Gen. 12:3 also allude to the Curse of Cain. Proper understanding of the “blessing” and historical fact show that “The Jews” are the Curse of Cain‘s inheritors. The eternal fugitives and vagabonds (Gen. 4:12), wandering from place to place, because their presence becomes increasingly irritating, noisome, and obnoxious to their host nations.

“The Jews,” of course, never quote this passage with regard to themselves, even though it fits the Jewish historical experience perfectly. Obvious discrepancies between Jewish history and the “blessings” of Abraham tell us that something is very wrong with “The Jews'” claim to be “blessed.” Either “The Jews” are lying about who they are, or the very history that they claim is wrong.


Careful reading of the Bible, and armed with understanding that to make sense one has to reverse the Massorete meddling (“Jew” in many cases mean “Judahite” or “Judaean”) it becomes easy to trace true genealogies, especially of the Jewish people both through the Bible and history. A procedure that clearly shows that the Jewish people are neither ShemitesHebrewsIsraelites or Judahites.

All of these claims are false made by an impostor people who have stolen the Judahite identity to claim the Yahweh Covenants‘ “blessings” and “promises.” This is “The Jews'” Great Impersonation of Israel. “The Jews” are not only False Israel (a completely different people altogether) but also a people who are actually True Israel’s worst enemies.

A sly, cunning, calculating enemy that with “cunning craftiness” devised a brilliant strategy of infiltration, subversion, and treachery to dis-empower and disenfranchise their great enemy and then proceeded to assume their identity.


The Great Apostle Paul was fully aware of “The Jews'” craftiness and wiles and their tendency to mythologise their condition, and warned us to beware of Jewish Fables (Titus 1:14). Their misuse of Gen. 12:3, which does not even mention “Jews,” taking a part of the quotation and using it out of context, is the beginning of the biggest Jewish Fable of them all: False Israel‘s Great Impersonation of True Israel. It is the Jewish Myth’s fundamental motif, which together with the modern fable of “The Holocaust,” are “The Jews'” greatest propaganda weapons.

“Anti-Semitism” and “The Holocaust” are word-weapons used to silence legitimate criticism of Jewish Power and its misuse; they are cunning Jewish “tricks.”


Proper study of both the Bible and history soon proves “The Jew’s” great imposture because the Marks of True Israel are clearly seen. The children of Israel had numerous prophecies spoken about them in the Old Testament, which have all been fulfilled to the letter by True Israel, and not by False Israel, “The Jews.”

Over twenty prophecies have been fulfilled by the Caucasian people (Abraham’s true Adamic seed, True Israel) and have not been fulfilled by the Jewish people. A reality that easily distinguishes two different groups of people the Bible narrative calls “Heirs of the Promise,” or “The Covenant People,” or “The Chosen People.”

While the White Anglo-Saxons can claim 20 prophecies fulfilled, “The Jews” can claim zero, no prophecy has manifest in their history.

In short, the only identifiable racial group that can fit the Marks of Israel are lineal descendants of the three Houses of Isaac: the House of Israel, the House of Judah, and the House of David, whose descendants were the Scythians, Celts, Gauls, Franks, and Goths etc., but especially the Anglo-Saxons … and collectively are the White, Caucasian peoples.

Whereas Yahweh “blessed” the three Houses of Isaac He despised the House of Edom because it was degraded and reprobate. … it was Cain’s posterity, and so anti-Yahweh and anti-Christ.

“The Jews” first appeared on the scene about 125 BC soon after John Hyrcanus conquered the land of Idumaea, and forced the natives to convert to Yahwehism and practice circumcision. Soon after the world’s first “Jew” appeared and with him the “Jewish religion” began.

In a profound sense the Idumaeans were the first “conversos,” Jews who professed to convert (the Idumaeans to Yahwehism, “The Jews” to Christianity) in order to avoid persecution or expulsion while secretly practising their true religion based upon Babylonian Mysteries and later Kabbalah and the Talmud.

The Judahites and remnant Israel had conquered Idumea and began making the Edomites citizens of Judaea, who then began the process of infiltrationsubversion, and co-option to later claim to be of the House of  Judah, and pretending as if they were true Israelites, were True Israel.

After Rome’s destruction of Jerusalem and Herod’s Temple in 70 AD, and dispersed around the Roman Empire, these wandering Idumaean Edomites insisted that they be called “Sephardim.”

The oriental-looking modern Jew, who looks very similar to the modern Palestinian, are the Modern Tribe of Jews‘ Sephardim component; the pale skinned, ashen complexioned modern Jew is the Ashkenazim, the Khazar descendants whose ancestors never set foot in the ancient Holy Land.

Sephardim are descendants of these dispersed, wandering Idumaean Edomites. A reality that jars with the Jewish Myth. While more ancient Jewish sources admit to their true ancestry, and that Edom is in modern Jewry, it fits the contemporary Jewish Myth-makers‘ current narrative to call the White Race “Edom,” and “Amalek.”

Another classic case of “The Jews'” dark magick of Reversing Reality.


Rabbis never expounded on Scripture’s great truths to the non-Jewish world for fear of failure, of being exposed as frauds. Instead, they use Kabbalah dark magic of Reversing Reality by fabricating Jewish Fables and repeat in ad nauseam silly slogans such as “The Jews are G-d’s chosen people,” “bless us or you will be cursed,” “We are the Semites of the Bible,” “we wrote the Bible,” and“Palestine is the Promised Land and belongs to us.”

Of course, none of these statements are true: all shameless lies but very effective propaganda, Jewish Fables intrinsic to the Jewish Myth, which has “hoodwinked” the Christian world.

The stark discrepancies between Bible prophecies and the historical record clearly shows “The Jews” cannot possibly be the Israelites of the Bible. By claiming to be, and acting as if they were, they have perpetrated the Greatest Identity Theft in History, and the Greatest Deception of the Ages.

Jesus Christ warned us about this deception when confronted by the Scribes and Pharisees and condemned them as hypocrites, liars, deceivers, moneylenders and charlatans, pretending to be True Israel, but are not. Matthew Chapter 23, Luke Chapter 12, and John Chapter 8 all tell us in no uncertain terms that Judaism‘s Scribes, Pharisees and rabbis are charlatans pretending to be something they are not.

“Beware the leaven of the [Edomite] Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.”

Luke 12:1



Marks of Cain

“And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him. And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper? And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.

And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother’s blood from thy hand; When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.





Without compassion for non-Jews (Gen. 4:9); Unable to farm (Gen. 4:12); Fugitives, who have been repeatedly expelled from the nations in which they reside (Gen. 4:12); Vagabonds, wandering from country to country (Gen. 4:12); Nomadic cattle herders (Gen. 4:20); Entertainers (Gen. 4:21); Arms dealers (Gen. 4:22); Greed (Josephus, Antiquities); Hybridizers (Josephus); Miscegenation (Jasher, Bible, History, Hollywood, TV adverts,, televangelism); Murderers: Bolshevism. Warmongering, Communism, Zionism; Genociders; Usurers (Moneylenders); Usurpers; Slave-traders; Child Molesters; Abortionists; Pornographers; Racketeers; Deceivers; False Accusers; False Priests; Hypocrites; Supremacists; Subversives; Fifth Columnists; Babylonian religion (Babylonian Talmud); Enemies of Christianity, anti-God, anti-Christ, and anti-human … Deicide …

Some of the myriad Marks of Cain borne by “The Jews,” who are, and throughout history, responsible for more criminality than all other ethnicities combined … Organised Jewry and its Jewish-Khazar Mafia.

Yahweh‘s sentencing of Cain after he had mercilessly slew his brother gives two of the “marks” his posterity would wear until the End of Days.

“The Jews,” although a miscegenated rag-bag of disparate ethnicities, are supremacists. “The Jews,” especially of the Sabbatean-Frankist variety, regard themselves godlike, and the non-Jew goyim merely human cattle. They are “God’s chosen,” and godlike and greater mankind a vast herd of human cattle.

In other words, “The Jews” have no brothers amongst the world’s myriad peoples. A breathtaking presumption and arrogance that is the Jewish Problem‘s root cause. Also, despite their claims to the contrary, “The Jews” have always remained an unassimilated people in whatever country they have settled; moreover, why they have never lived harmoniously in their host nations.

“The Jews” are history’s greatest ingrates and malcontents, never grateful, thankful or content. They are history’s greatest civilisation destroyers. The White Race are civilisation builders, “The Jews” are civilisation destroyers.  Always seeking to subvert, control, and destroy; never satisfied until they have a “world of their own.”



“The Jews” have always settled in propitious locations and then via their trusted MO of infiltration, subversion, and treachery, to dis-empower and disenfranchise, in order to exploit their host. To gain economic and political and exploit the host nations for whatever wealth they could steal through usury, chicanery and nepotism.

“The Jews” claims to promoting “brotherhood” end where their tribal self-interest lies; their one and only measure for action is the question:


“Is it good for The Jews”


Cain was not his “brother’s keeper,” and so his self-regard and disregard for the welfare of others is demonstrated. “The Jews'” outrageous presumptions to divinity, and their supremacist ideology, have alienated them from the brotherhood of man. Their merciless maltreatment of the Palestinians, especially the mass murder of women and children, is akin to Cain’s murderous treatment of Abel.


During the Sermon on the Mount Jesus Christ said “by their fruits ye shall know them” (Matt. 7:20). A profound statement wise Matthew Henry describes thus:

“By the fruits of their persons, their words and actions, and the course of their conversation. If you would know whether they be right or not, observe how they live; their works will testify for them or against them.

The scribes and Pharisees sat in Moses’s chair, and taught the law, but they were proud, and covetous, and false, and oppressive, and therefore Christ warned his disciples to beware of them and of their leaven [Mark 12:38].”


The Masters of Illusion have painted a quaint picture of the today’s Jews, convincing the majority of non-Jews that their indomitable spirit as “God’s chosen people” has carried them through two millennia of unjust persecution and “anti-Semitism,” culminating in “The Holocaust.” A Jewish Fable largely manufactured in the Hollywood “Dream Factory.” The TRUTH, of course, is the reverse of everything the Masters of Illusion say.

The Masters of Illusion and Jewish Myth-makers have given the modern Jew a false character and clothed him in an attractive raiment, and written a convincing, heart-rendering, teary-eyed script form him to portray.

All stuff and nonsense easily discerned when following Christ’s sage advice: pay attention to “The Jews'” behaviour because their deeds always belie their words. Their works always testify against them.

This is another Mark of Cain distinguishing “The Jews” as Cain’s posterity.


“The Jews” are an unneighbourly people because as the Jew Wise Martin Luther said they “haughtily and vainly despise” everyone else. An inner rancour and discontent that manifests as their inability to get along with their neighbours. Consequently, they have been perpetual vagabonds wandering the world, and fugitives from one country to the next, forever in search of more human prey.

Another Mark of Cain distinguishing “The Jews” as Cain’s posterity.


King Edward I (1239 – 1307), the “Hammer of the Scots,” imprisoned the entire Jewish population in his kingdom for criminal usury and for debasing the coin of the realm. Before releasing them, the king enacted two laws. The first law made it illegal for a Jew in England to loan money at interest and the second repealed all the laws, which kept Jews from the normal pursuits of the kingdom.

A very sensible and equable response to the “Jewish Problem” that was causing great trouble even at this early time in British history.

Edward, who was a politician and warrior of the first rank, offered “The Jews” a deal: they could lease land for a period of 15 years and work it, using this as a test of Jewry’s sincerity when it claimed that all it wanted was to have “work” like other people. If Jews proved their fitness to live like other people the inference was that Edward would let them buy land outright and admit them to the higher privileges of citizenship.

“The Jews” roundly rejected Edward’s enlightened covenant offered to between a king and an alien people in his realm. Instead they abused this good will by coming up with even more inventive ways to practice usury. New methods of chiselling the peasants and noblemen so outrageous that the outcry against “The Jews” became so great that Edward was forced to expel them to avert a civil war.

Edward’s Edict of Expulsion of 1290 reads:

“To the same end [a tax levy] in the year, all Jews, with their goods, children and wives, around the holiday of All Saints [November 1st], are banished from the land of England and of Aquitania [the south-west France], King Edward having conceded.”

It is not recorded that one Jew took advantage of the right, offered them by Edward, to till the soil. A phenomenon Henry Ford understood when he made his famous offer seven hundred years later: that he would give a reward of $1,000 (a considerable sum at the time) if a Jewish farmer could be found in America. Ford’s offer, like Edward’s centuries before, was not taken up.


“The Jews” do not farm, because the ground will not willingly yield up fruit for Cain‟s descendants. Cain’s slewing of Abel was the very first murder, where blood was first spilled on Virgin Mother Earth. And thus the inordinate bad karma involved in this seminal act of murder attached to Cain and his posterity; Mother Earth withholding her fecundity from Cain’s descendants, for example.

The rabbis, acknowledging this fact, teach from their Talmud not to bother becoming farmers. The voice of Cain can be heard frequently amongst the extensive Talmudic ramblings such as; “The occupation of farming is the least of all occupations.” (Yebamoth 63a.)

Yet another Mark of Cain distinguishing “The Jews” as Cain’s posterity.


Prophecies pertaining to True Israel state very clearly that Israel would be an agricultural people, farmers, which “The Jews” have never been; a seagoing people, which “The Jews” have never been; a great military people, which “The Jews” have never been, a constant royal dynasty, which “The Jews” have never been, a people who would accept the Messiah, which “The Jews” have never been; and, a people who would witness the Bible to the world, which “The Jews”  have never done.

Furthermore, a people who would forget their True Identity, which True Israel have, but “The Jews” have not; their Great Impersonation perforce making them forever boastful of their ancient lineage: to “boast so arrogantly about their lineage.”


Genesis 4:17-24 tells how judged and sentenced Cain cast off all fear of Yahweh, and attended no more on Yahweh’s ordinances. Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, never to come into it again. Cain dwelt in the land of “Nod,” which means, “shaking,” or “trembling,” alluding to his own spirit’s restlessness and uneasiness; it also was called the “land of a vagabond.”

While the godly on earth looked for the heavenly city, Cain, not minding that city, built one on earth. We then learn of Cain’s immediate descendants, who are: Enoch, after whom he named his city; Irad, Mehujael, Methusael, and Lamech. Lamech had two wives, who bore him Jabal, Jubal, and Tubalcain. Jabal’s descendants dwelt in tents, and so were a nomadic people. Jubal’s descendants were musicians. Tubalcain was a metalworker who invented the instruments of war, such as swords, spears, shields, etc.


The account given in Gen. 4:25 through to Gen. 5:4 relates how Adam and Eve had a third son, whose name was “Seth.” Seth was Abel’s replacement, whom Cain slew; and so, was the replacement “promised seed.” The rest of Chapter 5 presents Adam’s lineal descendants, the Adamites. What is of great significance is this: Cain is not listed in Adam and Eve’s line of descent. The Cainites genealogy is totally separate and distinct from that of the Adamites.

The First and Third Gospels give the genealogy of Jesus to show that Jesus Christ was the Promised One; the Son of God and Son of David, and that He is the Son of God by virtue of His conception by the Spirit. A Virgin Birth by Immaculate Conception and that He is Son of David by virtue of His birth of Mary, a Judahite, who is most certainly not a “Jewess.”

In short, Jesus was a Judahite not a “Jew,” and therefore not only an Adamite, a “seed of the woman,” but also the “promised Seed.”


Luke, Chapter 3, gives Adam’s genealogy from Yahweh, Adam’s father, down to Jesus the Nazarene. Luke’s table of genealogy thus traces Jesus’ ancestry up to Adam, “which was the son of God.”


Cain is not listed in either of these genealogies (Genesis and Luke) even though his mother was Eve. If Adam were Cain’s father, the Bible would certainly have noted this as a fact. It does not. These genealogies exist so that those who read the Biblical narrative correctly will understand that the Holy Bible is a history of bloodlines; and who can tell the difference between one distinct group of people from the other.

For obvious reasons, Judaism’s rabbis and Organised Jewry/Judaeo-Freemasonry‘s “Judaeo-Christian” ministers, “wolves in sheep’s clothing,” do not teach anything about these genealogies; because they expose their outrageous lies and religious frauds.

Because the modern Christian world has been thoroughly Judaised and believes the Jewish Myth as true history, and specially “The Jews'” claim to be “God’s chosen,” the vast majority of professed Christians are not interested in finding out whether “The Jews'” claims are actually true. The wise, of course, know that they are not.


Gen. 15:18-21 are very important verses, because they give us the names of the tribes associated with Cain’s descendants:

“In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.”


A certain tribe called the “Kenites” is listed first. A significant fact, a momentous subject upon which all rabbis and most theologians are silent. To read the Biblical narrative correctly one must understand who the Kenites were and who are their descendants today.

Strong’s Concordance (#7014 & #7017) is most helpful on the matter:

“7014 Qayin kah’-yin the same as 7013 (with a play upon the affinity to 7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe:–Cain, Kenite(-s).

“7017 Qeyniy kay-nee’ or Qiyniy (1 Chron. 2:55) {kee-nee’}; patronymic from 7014; a Kenite or member of the tribe of Kajin:–Kenite.”


In short, “Kenites” are the “descendants of Cain.” In other words, the generations provided for us in Gen. 4, the descendants of Cain, are Gen. 15‘s “Kenites.”


Genesis Chapter 15 details Yahweh’s Covenant with Abram. Here is the Yahweh Covenant ratified, repeated and explained to Abram. The Promised Land‘s bounds are stated, and specific tribes and nations are spoken of, that must be cast out to make room for Abram’s seed. A pact Matthew Henry described thus:

“[Yahweh] specifies the boundaries of the land intended hereby to be granted. And then, for the greater certainty, as is usual in such cases, he mentions in whose tenure and occupation these lands now were. Ten several nations, or tribes, are here spoken of that must be cast out, to make room for the seed of Abram.

They were not possessed of all these countries when God brought them into Canaan. The bounds are fixed much narrower [Num. 34:2-3]. But:

(1.) In David’s time, and Solomon’s, their jurisdiction extended to the utmost of these limits.

(2.) It was their own fault that they were not sooner and longer in possession of all these territories. They forfeited their right by their sins, and by their own sloth and cowardice kept themselves out of possession.

(3.) The land granted is here described in its utmost extent because it was to be a type of the heavenly inheritance, where there is room enough: in our father’s house are many mansions. The present occupants are named, because their number, and strength, and long prescription, should be no hindrance to the accomplishment of this promise in its season, and to magnify God’s love to Abram and his seed, in giving to that one nation the possessions of many nations, so precious were they in his sight, and so honourable.”

Matthew Henry’s Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible, God’s Covenant with Abram


Yahweh listed ten tribes, including the “Kenites,” which “must be cast out, to make room for the seed of Abram.” Canaan had to be ethnically cleansed of other bloodlines … Luciferic Bloodlines. This is the Yahweh Eugenic Imperative required to safeguard the Hebrew, Israelite, but especially the Judahite bloodlines.

Shepherd God Yahweh selected Abram and his posterity as His “chosen people,” and guarded and guided them ensuring that their bloodline was unpolluted, their unique “blood consciousness” conditioned, so that the Light God Christ would have the perfect human body, unsullied by Luciferic polluted blood and corrupt DNA, as well as the perfectly conditioned soul, for Him to incarnate in human form.

The tribes Yahweh slated for removal where all immersed in Luciferic pollution, their degree of contamination, how far fallen they were, manifest in their various evil ways and religious practices.

Moses was Moon God Yahweh‘s great Moon Prophet such that divine revelations were made “mouth to mouth” (Num. 12:8). Moses endured an arduous initiation process that was completed when Yahweh met him on Horeb, appearing in the flaming acacia tree, and appointed him to be his people’s leader and deliverer.

A task fulfilled when he lead the Israelites during the Exodus, and wanderings in the wilderness, up to the Promised Land‘s border.

Yahweh forbade Moses to go further because his great task was now over. Another phase of God’s Rescue Plan had began. Yahweh Himself had begun to withdraw from direct action in human affairs, and the Israelite’s conquering of the Promised Land and making of it the Holy Land necessitated a changed leadership.



As Moon God Yahweh began His slow withdrawal from human affairs, the Sun God Christ was preparing His Incarnation in human form. Hence the required change in leadership:

“And [Yahweh] said unto Moses, Take thee Joshua the son of Nun, a man in whom is the [Sun] spirit, and lay thine hand upon him;  And set him before Eleazar the priest, and before all the congregation; and give him a charge in their sight.

And thou shalt put some of thine honour upon him, that all the congregation of the children of Israel may be obedient. And he shall stand before Eleazar the priest, who shall ask counsel for him after the judgment of Urim before [Yahweh]: at his word shall they go out, and at his word they shall come in, both he, and all the children of Israel with him, even all the congregation.

And Moses did as [Yahweh] commanded him: and he took Joshua, and set him before Eleazar the priest, and before all the congregation: And he laid his hands upon him, and gave him a charge, as the Lord commanded by the hand of Moses.”

Numbers 27:18-23


Joshua was the prophet of Christ, in his dual capacity as heir to Moses and the New Covenant with the coming Christ, the Sun God, commanded both the Sun and the Moon.

Joshua, the Sun Prophet of Christ, took command of the Israelites from Moses, the Moon Prophet of Yahweh, led them into Canaan, and thereby initiated the Sun leadership of the Israelites and their unique task as vessels of the Christ ImpulseYahweh was still in attendance when Joshua lead the Israelites into the Promised Land to ensure that His Eugenic Imperative was carried out. To direct the Israelite’s purge of Luciferic bloodlines from Canaan.

In Gen. 15:18-21Moon Prophet Moses records Moon God Yahweh‘s injunction to purge Canaan and named the Luciferic bloodlines: along with Cain’s descendants, the Kenites, nine other tribes, variously corrupted, were named: Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaims, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites, and the Jebusites.

The Kadmonites were “the Eastern” and “one of the ancient race,” along with the Kenites and Kenizzites of Edom, were “the children of the east,” whose wisdom was celebrated. Their main habitation was Mount Hermon, which marks Palestine’s north boundary. Its modern name is Jebel-esh-Sheikh, “the chief mountain,” and it is one of the most conspicuous mountains in Palestine or Syria.

Mount Hermon is a place of great significance. It was the “high mountain apart” Jesus Christ and his disciples climbed in one day, and remained on its summit all night, “weary after their long and toilsome ascent.” During the night Jesus “was transfigured before them; and his face did shine as the sun.” The next day they descended to Caesarea Philippi.

Mt. Hermon is also the traditional site where the Fallen Angels descended from “heaven.”


Esau/Edom/Edomites/Idumeans: “The Jews”

“And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom.  And Jacob said, Sell me this day thy birthright. And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?

And Jacob said, Swear to me this day; and he sware unto him: and he sold his birthright unto Jacob. Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentiles; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright.”

Genesis 25:29-34


“Esau is Edom.”

Genesis 36:8



“And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.”

Genesis 28:1

Here is Isaac’s injunction to Jacob to not race-mix his True Israel bloodline with the False Israel bloodlines, the “Serpent seed.”



“When [Yahweh] shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;

And when [Yahweh] shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.”

Moses here relating the Yahweh Eugenic Imperative to Joshua and the Israelites that once in the Promised Land to purge it of Luciferic bloodlines and to “Make no covenants with Canaanites.”

The Israelites entering Canaan were True Israel, of “Eve’s seed,” and Yahweh was setting conditions whereby its pure bloodline was preserved; by condemning Race-mixing. The later books of Ezra and Nehemiah use exactly the same language, telling True Israel not give its daughters to the “Serpent seeds'” sons, nor should they take their daughters for its sons.  (Ezra 9:2, 12Neh.10:13:25)

In his discourse with the Pharisees, “The Jews,” Jesus Christ agreed with them that they were indeed Abraham’s seed, but, He qualified this by telling them that they were descendants of Esau and not of Jacob.

That they were Edomite Jews and although descendants of Abraham and Isaac through Esau they were not Jacob’s descendants and therefore not recipient of the Yahweh Covenants made with Abraham and with Moses, and inherited by Jacob (Israel). They – “The Jews” – were not heirs or recipients of the Abrahamic and Davidic Covenants.

Two of Esau’s three wives (his Hittite and Canaanite wives) were of the Serpent Seed and so were not in Adam’s race and their offspring, likewise, are not in the Book of Life and accursed of God (Gen. 26:34-35). Although Esau’s children by his Ishmaelite wife are of Adam’s race, they are not recipient of the Yahweh Covenants made with True Israel.

Esua, having violated his sacred duty to keep his Race and bloodline pure, migrated to Mt. Seir, the territory of the Canaanites, and began to live among them. As his family grew and prospered among them, they, the Edomites, became the ruling clan. Genesis 36 gives us the genealogies of Esau-Edom‘s descendants: “Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom.”

From these and earlier genealogies we can conclude that there is a lineal descent from Cain down to Esau, and thus “The Jews.” In abbreviated form, it is:


Cain ⇒ Kenites ⇒ Canaanites ⇒ Edomites ⇒ “The Jews”


Cain and the Kenites had lived in the antediluvian world and their bloodline survived The Flood of 3298 BC. Yahweh told Abraham that the Kenites were still in existence and living in the land of Canaan.

Canaan’s posterity had commingled with the various tribes of Gen. 15:18-21, and eventually all of these tribes were called by their patriarch’s name, Canaanites. Later, when Esau-Edom mingled amongst them and became ascendant, their name became Edom. In the New TestamentEdom is referenced by two different words the Greek word “Idumeans” and Massorete invented word, “Jews.”


The New Testament is unequivocal on the matter and repeatedly records the point that most so-called “Jews” in the days of Christ’s Mission were not a Semitic people (Matt. 23:33-35; John 8:33-34; Rev. 2:9; 3:9). The majority of Judaeans in Christ’s Time were Idumeans (Edomites) who were of the Esau Line, descendants of Esau, the eldest son of Isaac who would have inherited the covenant Yahweh made with Abraham, the Abrahamic Covenant, inherited by Isaac; but Esau traded his birthright to his twin brother Jacob for a mess of pottage (Gen. 25:29-34).

Esau/Edom was the progenitor of the Edomites and Turks. John Hyrcanus conquered the Idumeans (Edomites) and incorporated them into Judaea, had them convert to Yahwehism and the men compulsorily circumcised.

John Hyrcanus, victorious in battle, made a ghastly mistake in his dealings with the vanquished Idumeans. His seemingly magnanimous offer of citizenship along side the existing Judahites of Judah was loaded with catastrophic ramifications. He gave the Idumeans an ultimatum: be circumcised or die! Your foreskin or your life!

Hence, when the Idumean men lined up for circumcision, the first to sacrifice his foreskin was the world’s first “Jew.”

Also, the first “converso” who could now pretend to be a Judahite, now given full citizenship in a nation which had, until this time, forbidden citizenship to all non-Israelites; as well as practising his old religion in secret while paying lip service to Yahweh. Even worse, the Idumeans were the descendants of those Canaanites that Yahweh ordered Joshua to exterminate or purge from the Promised Land.

John Hyrcanus’ fateful decision had mixed the Holy Seed with the unholiest seed of all: the anti-Christ seed of Cain.

By submitting to circumcision, the Edomite Jews, “The Jews,” came into being. A situation that allowed “The Jews” to publicly pretend to practice Yahwehism and obey Mosaic Law while secretly substituting their own pagan traditions; thus, Pharisaism was born. The Idumeans never converted to Yahwehism.

Hyrcanus not only violated True Israel‘s exclusivity, repudiated the Yahweh Eugenic Imperative, and Yahweh’s direct command to make no marriages or covenants with Canaanites (Deut. 7), but also created the possibility for the Idumeans to pretend to be Judahites, to profane Yahwehism, and to subvert True Israel. Hyrcanus had committed the same sin that caused the nation of Judah to be exiled into Babylon. Further, the Idumeans‘ inclusion into the nation of Judah was itself a violation of the Yahweh Eugenic Imperative, of the Law of Moses.

Pharisaism is an upstart religion with no rightful claim to a Biblical origin. Before Hyrcanus’ fateful decision made in 121 BC there was no such thing as a “Jew,” and there was no such religion as “Pharisaism.” Both arose from the merger of two enemies, two antithetical nations. An unholy synthesis, a marriage made in hell, which was the true origin of “The Jews” and their anti-God, anti-Christ, anti-human religion. Contrary to the Jewish Myth-makers and their Jewish Fables, the Kings of Judah did not allow circumcision of non-Judahites, and making of them fake Judahites, until this date.

A date of monumental significance since it is the beginning of Judah’s downfall at the hands of the Idumeans. A holy war carried out over the next two millennia manifest today as True Israel‘s imminent downfall at the hands of “The Jews.”


The Jewish Myth-makers have it that these Idumeans whole-hardheartedly embraced Yahwehism and accepted the Law of Moses. The reality is they never did. On the contrary, this is the time when the Edomites began to impersonate Judah and to pretend to follow Hebrewism, but all the while slowly corrupting it. Hence, why Jesus Christ tells us that “The Jews'” tradition – Pharisaism – “makes the Law [of God] of none effect.” (Matt. 15:3-6.)

There are many reasons why “The Jews” have a pathological hatred for both Christ and the New Testament. One of the main reasons is that they expose them and their Great Imposture. Christ repeatedly accused “The Jews” as hypocrites, liars and frauds; repeatedly condemned their religion as anti-God and anti-human. All four Gospels relate the blood-feud between Jesus and “The Jews;” between the Light God Christ incarnate in human form and the Dark God’s Synagogue of Satan.

The New Testament is thus a tale of the ancient conflict of Good vs. Evil acted out in the Arena of History. Wherein the Light God Christ incarnate in human form fought with the children of darkness, and exposed “The Jews'” infiltration and subversion of True Israel, as well as their lies, hypocrisy and treachery. One of the New Testament’s most important themes, which the modern Judaised Christian churches and their “Judaeo-Christian” ministers pointedly ignore. A wonderful success for “The Jews” and their Judaising of Christianity Agenda.

By ignoring this most important subject the “Judaeo-Christian” ministershave kept their congregants in complete darkness as to the nature of this evil. These False Teachers are the “wolves in sheep’s clothing,” which have led their flock along the road to perdition; have made tens of millions of them into Christian Zionists, have made of them the Christian Zionist Death Cult.


The Idumeans willingly accepted the Judaeans’ religion, so completely, that in Christ’s Time, the Idumeans/Edomites had (with Imperial Rome’s support) the ascendancy and ruled over Judaea as “The Jews” … as “unbelieving Jews” that refused to follow both Yahwehism and “The Way.”

The Herods, the Kings of Judea, were of Idumean origin and as “Jews” ruled over the two races (Israelites and Edomites) as one people, Judaeans. Flavius Josephus wrote, “there was a certain friend of Hyrcanus, an Idumean, called Antipater” (Antiquities of the Judahites, 14:50). When, Herod, the son of the Idumean Antipater “received the kingdom, he slew all the members of this Sanhedrin” (Antiquities of the Judahites, 9). Why?

Because Herod was an Edomite and not a Judahite and the sitting members of the Sanhedrin were all Israelites and/or Judahites and Benjaminites of the House of Judah. Herod, the Idumean, the Edomite, assassinated all of them, True Israel, and replaced them with his kindred, cronies and sycophants (False Israel).

The “Judaeo-Christian” churches are silent on this crucial period of biblical history, when a major transition of power took place. A political coup staged by Edomites led by Antipater and Herod. While Bible scholars know that these two usurpers were Edomites the Judaised Christian churches choose not to reveal this fact to the lay Christian world. The reason for this is because they are products of the Judaising of Christianity Agenda helping “The Jews” to hide their true identity of False Israel hiding behind the mask of True Israel.

A massive fraud and deception that is intrinsic to the Last Day’s Great Deception.


As the Ancient Greek world slowly yielded to the Roman world (280 – 133 BC), and before the Roman conquest under Pompey, chaos reigned in the land of Judah. A tumultuous period the Books of Maccabees or “The Book of the Hasmoneans” describe.

The Maccabees were the reigning Judahite dynasty, which followed Yahweh‘s ancient command to preserve their pure blood, and fought valiantly to retain their Judahite heritage and laws; their racial integrity. In 147 BC, the Maccabees gained independence from the Greeks, but they knew it was only a matter of time before the Roman Empire would expand to the south and attack Judah, which came in 63 BC when Pompey took control of Judah. A period of social and political chaos out of which the perfidious Idumeans saw an opportunity to usurp the Royal House of Judah by working with the Romans against it.


Antipater, a conniving Idumean Edomite, was one of two envoys the Sanhedrin sent to negotiate with the Romans and Spartans (1 Macc 12:16; 14:22); and by playing the Royal House of Judah against the Romans, he implied that a Idumean calming influence would, and could, keep the Judahite revolutionary spirit in check. Consequently, Pompey installed Antipater as Judahite King Hyrcanus II‘s vizier i.e., his “Jewish handler.”

After Julius Caesar’s assassination, Antipater schemed with Mark Antony to usurp the Judahite hereditary dynasty, and put it into the hands of his sons, who were racial Idumeans, not Judahites.

John Hyrcanus, although a proud Judahite and an able general, wilfully ignored the Yahweh Eugenic Imperative, and naively believed that by foisting circumcision and Yahwehism onto the Idumeans, then granting them full citizenship, all would be well in his kingdom. History shows it was not the case. Gullible Hyrcanus had not created a future Judahite utopia but had laid the foundations of Judah’s destruction by creating an instant Fifth Column of subversives and traitors by granting the Idumeans equality with the Judahites.

Hyrcanus did not know that the Idumeans had begun their long, slow march to establish their Jewish Utopia. That “The Jews” were honing their Revolutionary Technique ofinfiltrationsubversionsteering, and co-opting; that “The Jews” were entering a new phase of their Nameless War on True Israel.

Hyrcanus did not know that “The Jews” were establishing a modus operandi of infiltration, subversion, steering, subjugationplunder and destruction to bring about True Israel’s ruin, and to establish their future Jewish Utopia – a Jewish World Empire – “a world of their own.”

Hyrcanus did not know that “The Jews” were preparing a template for World Revolution, which the seriously misunderstood The Protocols of the (Learned) Elders of Zion describe.

Hyrcanus’ race-mixed nation became known as “Judaea.” A multicultural nightmare that violated the Yahweh Eugenic Imperative and Mosaic Law that prohibit race-mixing; moreover, violated the principle: “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers.” (II Cor. 6:14).


Judahite historian Josephus provides an account of the new nation Judaea’s troubled times. How John Hyrcanus had a peaceful death, but he left his people in turmoil. Josephus describes the struggles of his two eldest sons, Aristobulus and Antigonus, to regain control of the Kingdom from Idumean Herod. But Herod’s alliance with the Idumean dominated Pharisees and Judaea’s pro-Roman factions were too strong.

A Judahite struggle to regain political power weakened by brotherly rivalry, by Aristobulus and Antigonus fighting each other for control of the kingdom. Aristobulus soon murdered his brother, but within a year, died of bowel disease.

A younger brother, Alexander Janneus, imprisoned by Aristobulus was released and made king. Judahite Alexander opposed the increasingly Idumean influenced Pharisees, which caused constant strife resulting in civil war. Yet, against seeming insurmountable odds, Alexander managed to defeat insurrection as well as foreign foes; defeating the Syrians, Idumeans and Phoenicians in battle, thus regaining much territory for the the Kingdom of Judah.

After reigning 27 years Alexander succumbed to a disease leaving the kingdom to his wife, Alexandra. Before he died Alexander advised her upon his death to quickly make an alliance with the Pharisees as they were the main cause of kingdom’s political and religious problems. This she did, but the result was while Alexandra sat on the throne it was the Pharisees that were the power behind that throne; controlling the country from behind the scenes. Thus Josephus:

“So she had indeed the name of Regent, but the Pharisees had the authority” (Antiquities of the Judahites, 13.16.2).


After reigning 9 years Alexandera died, succeeded by her son, Hyrcanus II, named after John Hyrcanus. This Hyrcanus was the Judahite monarch who made the allegiance with the rich Idumean Antipater. Who later connived with Rome to become Hyrcanus’ adviser-courtier. After successfully infiltrating the House of Judah, perfidious “Jew” began its subversion by committing treachery by secretly conniving against it.

Using the Terrible Power of the Jewish Purse to bribe Julius Caesar to install his sons, Herod and Phasaelus, as local governors; positioning them for the future Idumeancoup d’etat.

Regarding the ensuing corruption of Hyrcanus II’s court, Josephus tells us:

“The principal men of the [Judahites] came thither, to accuse Phasaelus [Herod’s Edomite brother] and Herod, and they said that Hyrcanus had indeed the appearance of reigning, but that these men [Phasaelus and Herod] had all the power.”

Antiquities of the Judahites 14.12.2


While the Kingdom had a pure-blooded Judahite on the throne, it was the Edomites in control: “The Jews” were the power behind the throne.

Idumeans Antipater, Phasaelus and Herod were the prototype “Jewish Handler.” A Jew, variously using wheedling, bribery, blackmail, and assassination, to gain positions of power and  influence over goy kings, princes, lords and leaders; and, to advance both his own best interests as well as those of “The Jews.” A technique honed in the subsequent millennia in the sinister figure of the “Court Jew,” the money-lender and tax collector to the European royal houses.

“The Jews” established the Edomite House of Herod by treachery, bribery, and a bloody civil war in which they influenced both sides. Another crucial part of “The Jews'” evolving World Revolution template, which the seriously misunderstood The Protocols of the (Learned) Elders of Zion wonderfully describe.


The Edomite House of Herod is the first instance where “The Jews” gained political power over True Israel. When race-mixed Edomite Jews conspired and usurped the Davidic throne of Judah.

“The Jews”are perennial purveyors of leaven, great story-tellers, wonderful myth-makers, forever spinning Jewish Fables to make them appear more attractive, more human, than they actually are. Constantly tweaking their Jewish Myth to ensure that the IdumeanGreat Impersonation of Judah is never revealed.

An exercise in re-writing history in which censuring and deleting any mention of “The Jews'” Canaanite ancestry is a prerequisite. “The Jews” must always pretend to be True Israel and Judah, otherwise, their great charade would be over and Christians would finally recognise them for what they really are; willing vessels for the spirit of anti-Christ … anti-Christ Jews that put Christ on the Cross at Calvary.


For the Jewish Myth to appear consistent on the matter of religion it perforce argues the case of a seamless transition from Yahwehism to Pharisaism. In other words, the ancient pure-blood Levitical priesthood fully endorsed the transition; and that racially exclusive Levitical priesthood had naturally morphed into the racially mixed Pharisaical priesthood.

Of course, being part of the Jewish Myththis too never happened. “The Jews” here relying heavily upon people’s indolence, ignorance;, and assumption. Lazy intellects that assumed it must have happened; otherwise, where would the Pharisees get their Mosaic authority from?


By the time of the Herodian usurpation the Levitical priesthood was in a lowly condition. It had been outlawed during the Greek and Roman occupations and because of this religious and political vacuum, the Judahite kings were forced to appoint non-Levitical men as High Priests, often assuming the position themselves.

At this time, Josephus tells of three main sects vying for the priesthood: the Essenes, the Sadducees and the Pharisees. Moreover, that only the Essenes were true Judahites, who were totally loyal to the Law of Moses (Wars, 2.8.2.).


Before Herod, the Levitical priesthood was kept racially pure. However, the religious office was not. The occupying powers of Greece and Rome understood the Levitical priesthood’s power over Judah, and so the position of High Priest became a political football, kicked from one faction to another.

When Herod first “received the kingdom, he slew all the [Judahite] members of this Sanhedrin,” assassinated all of them, and replaced them with his kindred, cronies and sycophants; later, he was emboldened to appointed his Idumean subjects to the position. Herod ina major act of insult to the Judahites, even imported a Canaanite priest from Babylon, Anenalus, and gave him the High Priesthood.


Herod the Great had ruthlessly suppressed political and religious opposition by assassination and by gradually replacing  Judahite leaders and priests with his Idumean cronies. He also established the Pharisee sect as the official state Priesthood. Just as Idumean Herod had usurped the throne of Judah, the Idumean dominated Pharisee sect had usurped the priesthood of Judah.

A historic reality the Jewish Myth tries to mask; and most certainly a subject upon which Judaism‘s rabbis are silent, not wanting to make Christians aware of the Idumean coup d’etat.

Josephus tell us that:

“for when Herod had received the kingdom, he slew all the members of this [Judahite] Sandhedrin, and Hyrcanus himself also, excepting Sameas, for he had a great honor for him on account of his [presumed] righteousness and because, when the city was afterwards besieged by Herod and Sosius, he persuaded the people to admit Herod into it.”

Antiquities of the Judahites, Book 14, Chapter 9, Para. 4

Josephus also relates how the women of Judah were constantly agitating publicly against Herod while he shared power with Hyrcanus, demanding that Herod be put on trial for murdering true Judahites in his pursuit of power.

Josephus was a Judahite and not a “Jew,” and his books Antiquities were historical accounts of  Judahite history not a “Jewish” history. That is why “The Jews” detested Josephus because his works were about Judahite history, and so revealed the truth, True Israel‘s true history, and exposed “The Jews'” great imposture.

Books XIII through XVII of Antiquities give us all the details of Idumean infiltration, subversion, intrigue, assassinations, bribery, poisonings, etc., that plagued Judaea at that fateful time; when Idumeans, the Herodians, machinated for supreme power over Judah, and began their Great Imposture as True Israel.

From Josephus and other extant sources it is clear that  IdumeanHerod had murdered the Sanhedrin’s Judahite stock, and the Judahite King Hyrcanus II was complicit in this terrible act of treachery. That this Hyrcanus was a weak, shallow ruler who did not perceive Idumean treachery for what it was: power moves to usurp his authority and position.

Both this Hyrcanus and his namesake ancestor were prototype “Gentile” rulers that “Jewish Handlers” exploited for their own and “The Jews” best interests. They are the start of a depressingly long list of untold millions of other Useful Goy, of Useful Idiots, which unwittingly advanced first the Idumean Great Imposture as True Israel, and later “The Jews'” World Revolutionary Movement.


The Jewish Myth-makers forever spinning Jewish Fables would have the world believe that the turmoil in Judaea at this time was merely internal power struggles between “Jews” vying for supreme power, and “Jewish” sects manoeuvring for ultimate power in the Sandhedrin and The Temple. It was not.

The reality was that the Kingdom of Judah was victim of a very cleverly planned coup d’etat not only by a hostile foe but also its worst enemy, the Kenites. It was not an internecine feud amongst kindred people, but  infiltrationsubversion, and violent usurpation by an outside foe.

Hyrcanus II although weak-willed was still a true Judahite King who tried to free his people from the Roman yolk of domination. He made an alliance with the Parthians, who were a formidable military force, which Rome was unable to defeat on the battlefield.

Hyrcanus did not realise the depth of Herod’s treachery, or the extent of histies to the Rome. He assumed that Herod would be loyal if not to the House of Judah, then at least to the Maccabees; since “the Herodian family … owed everything to the Maccabees” (Antiquities, 14, 1, 3).

In other words, Hyrcanus did not recognise in the figure of Herod the archetypal Perfidious Jew.

Thus Josephus:

”Accordingly, when Hyrcanus came, full of assurance, by the permission of the King of Parthia, and at the expense of the Jews, who supplied him with money, Herod received him with all possible respect, and gave him the upper place at public meetings, and set him above all the rest at feasts, and thereby deceived him.

[Herod] also did other things, in order to secure his government, which yet occasioned a sedition in his own family; for being cautious how he made any illustrious person [a True Judahite] the high priest of God, he sent for an obscure priest out of Babylon, whose name was Ananelus, and bestowed the high priesthood upon him.”

Antiquities of the Judahites, Book 15, Chapter 2, Paragraph 4.


The Idumean Herodian subversion of Judah continued:

“[These events mark] the collapse of the Maccabean power. What follows are only the throes of death. …

The factional disturbances at Rome and throughout the empire permitted of the enactment of the last stage of the Asmonean drama, in the final contest of Hyrcanus and Antigonus [the last of the Maccabean princes].

Herod was in Judea with Hyrcanus, when Antigonus with the Parthian hordes overran the country, caused Herod precipitately to evacuate Palestine, and after capturing Jerusalem in 40 BC, sent his uncle Hyrcanus as a captive to the East, after having cropped off his ears, to incapacitate him forever for the high-priestly office (Ant., XIV, xiii, 10).

Herod now obtained the aid of the Romans and permission to reconquer Judea. In a furious campaign, marked by the most shocking barbarities, he occupied the greater part of the country, and finally in 37 BC succeeded in taking Jerusalem. Antigonus surrendered but was executed at Antioch by Antony, at the instigation of Herod (Ant., XIV, xvi, 4).”

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1913)



And what were the fates of the hapless Hyrcanus and the perfidious Herod?

“The Pharisees, who dominated the bulk of the Jews, were content to accept Herod’s rule as a judgment of God. Hyrcanus returned from his prison: mutilated, he could no longer hold office as high-priest …

After the battle of Actium (31 B.C.) Herod executed Hyrcanus and proceeded to wait upon the victorious Octavian at Rhodes. His position was confirmed and his territories were restored. On his return he took in hand to heal with the Hasmonaeans, and in 25 B.C. the old intriguers, their [Judahite] victims like Mariamne, and all pretenders were dead.

From this time onwards Herod was free to govern Palestine, as a client-prince of the Roman Empire should govern his kingdom. In order to put down the brigands who still infested the country and to check the raids of the Arabs on the frontier, he built or rebuilt fortresses, which were of material assistance to the Jews in the great revolt against Rome. Within and without Judaea he erected magnificent buildings and founded cities. …

And as Jew and king of the Jews he restored the temple at Jerusalem. The emperor recognized his successful government by putting the districts of Ulatha and Panias under him in 20 B.C. …

On his deathbed Herod discovered that his eldest son, Antipater, whom Josephus calls a “monster of iniquity,” had been plotting against him. He proceeded to accuse him before the governor of Syria and obtained leave from Augustus to put him to death. The father died five days after his son in 4 B.C.

He had done much for the Jews, thanks to the favour he had won and kept in spite of all from the successive heads of the Roman state; he had observed the Law publicly—in fact, as the traditional epigram of Augustus says, “it was better to be Herod’s swine than a son of Herod.””

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Herod


Herod was not only the archetypal Perfidious Jew but also a template Machiavellian “Prince.”

Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 – 1527) was a statesman of Florence, political theorist and historian who advocated a strong central government. In his two profoundly influential books The Prince and The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy, Machiavelli give a detailed political vision that attempted to bring observed facts of contemporary despotism into relation with general ideas concerning law, liberty and the State.

Machiavelli is often regarded as the first theorist of the modern state, especially of the concept of Power, what it is, how it is obtained and how it is preserved. Machiavellianism is the political doctrine detailed in The Prince (1532)in which any means (however unscrupulous) can be used by a ruler (the “Prince”) in order to create and maintain his autocratic government: in short “the end justifies the means.”

Machiavelli’s works are realpolitik and close observation of men as they are, and not as one might wish them to be: ” … how easily men are corrupted . . . however good they may be and however well taught.” The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy (1518).

Herod was a model Machiavellian “Prince.” Without scruple or hesitation, he did everything to obtain power and preserve it, even murdering his own kith and kin, his own sons. A callous, ruthless, murderous nature that even discomposed the notoriously cruel Romans such that they said of him “it was better to be Herod’s swine than a son of Herod.”

A cruel, homicidal nature that is, of course, a Mark of Cain.



 Babylonian Talmud

Josephus’ account of Judahite history clearly describes Herod as a Machiavellian “Prince.” An unscrupulous, homicidal psychopath prepared to do anything to gain and maintain power. A consummate schemer, an inveterate betrayer.

Josephus clearly tells us that Herod manoeuvred to disenfranchise and dis-empower the Judahites by purging them from high office and emasculating their king. Hence his extreme tactics to prevent a True Judahite from being High Priest. Mutilating Hyrcanus so “he could no longer hold office as high-priest,” and sending to Babylon for a new High Priest.

This was the fateful time when Pharisaism established its Talmudic roots. When the “obscure priest out of Babylon, whose name was Ananelus [had] the high priesthood [bestowed] upon him.” When Ananelus and his entourage came to Jerusalem carrying with them their pagan traditions, their incipient “Talmud,” which became Pharisaism and the Talmud‘s basis.

The “Babylonian Talmud” is Babylonian because it was a pagan importation from Babylon into the traditions of the Mosaic LawYahwehism‘s subversion instigated by the Kenite Herod.

The Judahite prophets Ezra and Nehemiah returning from the Babylon Exile did not introduce Babylonian customs into the Mosaic tradition. Babylon was where this pagan priesthood had its main yeshiva (teaching and indoctrination centre); and it was in Babylon, and other places such as Pergamos, that the Babylonian Talmud was compiled.

Pharasiasim, and much later Judaism, came about during the days of the Idumeans Antipater and Herod, not during the days of the Judahites Ezra and Nehemiah.

Yet, the Jewish Myth-makers have it otherwise, that Ezra, Nehemiah and others brought back the fully fledged Talmud, and that these writings were the authentic voice of Yahweh.

Such as Stephen S Wise (1874 – 1949) formerly the “Chief Rabbi” of the United States and an Evil Jewish Leadership mouthpiece: “The return from Babylon and the introduction of the Babylonian Talmud mark the end of Hebrewism [Yahwehism] and the beginning of Judaism [Pharisaism].”

Zionist zealot Wise correctly distinguished between the Old Testament‘s true religion (Hebrewism, but is more properly Yahwehism) and the new religion forming in Babylon and brought to Judaea as Pharisaism (much later called Judaism). However, he is deliberately wrong in his dating. A deliberate lie to accord with the Jewish Myth, which has it that rabbi Wise’s race – the Ashkenazim – were exiled in Babylon when they were not.

Wise truthfully distinguished between the Ancient Hebrews’ religion (Yahwehism)and that of “The Jews” (Pharisaism). Moreover, that Pharisaism is based upon the Babylonian Talmud, which contains the supposed “Oral Law.”

A mythic “Oral Law” that was never reduced to writing and made part of the Bible; the Written Law, the Mosaic Law contained in the Old Testament. The “Oral Law” that gradually gained greater force among “The Jews” than the Written Law itself.

The “Oral Law,” a dark spiritual force that became a new religion in Jesus’ day that not only conflicted with the Written Law but directly opposed the new religion of Christ. In other words: Yahwehism waned as Pharisaism waxed in the hearts, minds and souls of “The Jews.”

Even by the time of Christ’s Earthly Mission His spiritual enemies and Jewish Myth-makers called the Babylonian Talmud the “Tradition of the Elders.”

“The Jews” and their Judaism are not the spiritual ancestors of Christians and Christianity; on the contrary they and their religion are entirely antithetical to both, both anti-Christ and anti-Christian: and their religion is the incipient One World Religion of Antichrist.

After True Israel‘s return its Babylonian Exile the only books added to the Old Testament were KingsChroniclesEzra and Nehemiah (historical, rather than doctrinal) HaggaiZechariah and Malachi.

These were added as Moon God Yahweh‘s influence upon the Judahites waned as He slowly, inexorably withdrew Himself from direct contact with humans (i.e. the Disappearance of Yahweh). They were books written in the transition period as Light God Christ slowly descended from the celestial spheres, came down from the Spiritual Hierarchy, in preparation for the great, cosmic event that was the Incarnation of Sun God Christ in human form.

In none of these later books do Judahites receive anything but rebuke (by proxy, via prophets, and not by direct communication with Yahweh) for their wickedness, backsliding and apostasy. This was the Shepherd God Yahweh guarding His flock, preserving their pure blood so that pristine Jesus the Nazarene would be born.

The Judahite prophets Ezra and Nehemiah returning from the Babylon Exile did not introduce Babylonian customs into the Mosaic tradition, on the contrary, under Yahweh‘s influence they reinforced the Written Law so that Yahwehism was revived amongst True Israel living in Galilee and Judah.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *