Ashkenazi Jews

“[The Khazars are] an ancient people who occupied a prominent place amongst the secondary powers of the Byzantine state-system. In the epic of Firdousi Khazar is the representative name for all the northern foes of Persia, and legendary invasions long before the Christian era are vaguely attributed to them.

But the Khazars are an historic figure upon the borderland of Europe and Asia for at least 900 years (A.D. 190–1100). The epoch of their greatness is from A.D. 600 to 950.

Their home was in the spurs of the Caucasus and along the shores of the Caspian called by medieval Moslem geographers Bahr-al-Khazar (“sea of the Khazars”); their cities, all populous and civilized commercial centres, were Itil, the capital, upon the delta of the Volga, the “river of the Khazars …

They were the Venetians of the Caspian and the Euxine, the organizers of the transit between the two basins, the universal carriers between East and West; and Itil was the meeting-place of the commerce of Persia, Byzantium, Armenia, Russia and the Bulgarians of the middle Volga.

The tide of their dominion ebbed and flowed repeatedly, but the normal Khazari may be taken as the territory between the Caucasus, the Volga and the Don, with the outlying province of the Crimea, or Little Khazaria [modern Ukraine]. …

The origin of the Khazars has been much disputed, and they have been variously regarded as akin to the Georgians, Finno-Ugrians and Turks. This last view is perhaps the most probable.

Their king Joseph, in answer to the inquiry of Ḥasdai Ibn Shaprūt of Cordova (c. 958), stated that his people sprang from Thogarmah, grandson of Japhet, and the supposed ancestor of the other peoples of the Caucasus. …

Nevertheless there are many points connected with the Khazars which indicate a close connexion with Ugrian or Turkish peoples. …

Meanwhile the Moslem empire had arisen. The Persian empire was struck down (637), and the Moslems poured into Armenia. The khakan, who had defied the summons sent him by the invaders, now aided the Byzantine patrician in the defence of Armenia. The allies were defeated, and the Moslems undertook the subjugation of Khazaria (651).

Eighty years of warfare followed, but in the end the Moslems prevailed. The khakan and his chieftains were captured and compelled to embrace Islam (737), and till the decay of the Mahommedan empire Khazaria with all the other countries of the Caucasus paid an annual tribute of children and of corn (737–861).

Nevertheless, though overpowered in the end, the Khazars had protected the plains of Europe from the Mahommedans, and made the Caucasus the limit of their conquests.

In the interval between the decline of the Mahommedan empire and the rise of Russia the Khazars reached the zenith of their power. …

The [Idumean Edomite] Jews, expelled from Constantinople, sought a home amongst them, developed the Khazar trade, and contended with Mahommedans and Christians for the theological allegiance of the Pagan people. The dynasty accepted Judaism (c. 740), but there was equal tolerance for all, and each man was held amenable to the authorized code and to the official judges of his own faith. …

The kingdom dwindled rapidly to its ancient limits between the Caucasus, the Volga and the Don, whilst the Russian traders of Novgorod and Kiev supplanted the Khazars as the carriers between Constantinople and the North. …

At the assault of Swiatoslav of Kiev the rotten fabric crumbled into dust. His troops were equally at home on land and water. Sarkel, Itil and Semender surrendered to him (965–969). He pushed his conquests to the Caucasus, and established Russian colonies upon the Sea of Azov. The principality of Tmutarakan, founded by his grandson Mstislav (988), replaced the kingdom of Khazaria, the last trace of which was extinguished by a joint expedition of Russians and Byzantines (1016).

The last of the khakans, George, Tzula, was taken prisoner. A remnant of the nation took refuge in an island of the Caspian (Siahcouyé); others retired to the Caucasus; part emigrated to the district of Kasakhi in Georgia, and appear for the last time joining with Georgia in her successful effort to throw off the yoke of the Seljuk Turks (1089). ”

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Khazars

Here is a brief account of Khazaria’s demise at the hands of Christian armies, and the source of the Khazars’ great and enduring enmity towards White Christian Russia; the modern day Jews’ hatred of the Slavic people.



“Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.”

Genesis 10:1

“[The Table of Nations] is the expression frequently used to indicate “the generations of the sons of Noah” contained in Ge 10. These occupy the whole chapter, and are supplemented by Ge 11:1-9, which explain how it came about that there were so many languages in the world as known to the Hebrews. The remainder of Genesis 11 traces the descent of Abram, and repeats a portion of the information contained in Genesis 10 on that account only. The whole is seemingly intended to lead up to the patriarch’s birth.

This chapter shows concerning the three sons of Noah, that of them was the whole earth overspread. No nation but that of the [Judahites] can be sure from which of these seventy it has come. The lists of names of fathers and sons were preserved of the [Judahites] alone, for the sake of the Messiah. Many learned men, however, have, with some probability, shown which of the nations of the earth descended from each of the sons of Noah.

To the posterity of Japheth were allotted the isles of the gentiles; probably, the island of Britain among the rest. All places beyond the sea from Judea are called isles, Jer 25:22. That promise, Is 42:4, The isles shall wait for his law, speaks of the conversion of the gentiles to the faith of Christ.”

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Table of Nations




Table of Nations
Table of Nations lands




“Thus, despite the view usually held, the Jewish people is racially heterogeneous; its constant migrations and its relations – voluntary or otherwise – with the widest variety of nations and peoples have brought about such a degree of crossbreeding that the so-called people of Israel can produce examples of traits typical of every people.”

Professor Juan Comas, The Race Question in Modern Science, United Nations Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization “UNESCO,” (1958)

In the year 740 AD an event took place that at the time appeared a simple political expedient made by an insignificant nation’s king to forestall two powerful enemies’ ambitions. A trivial event at the time, but with the benefit of hindsight it can now be seen for what it was; a world-historical event of monumental proportions.

The time when Khazaria’s king, its khakan, Joseph was compelled to make a political decision in order to save his kingdom from attack on two fronts; a northern threat from Christian Russia and the Mahommedan southern threat. The time when Khazaria’s king interviewed a Christian priest, a Pharisaic rabbi and a Muslim imam, and then chose Pharisaism as the new state religion. A fateful decision with momentous consequences that has brought ruin to the world.

King Joseph’s decision immediately increased the Jewish population tenfold since there were ten times as many Khazars in Khazaria as there were Sephardic Jews in the rest of the world; and so, magnified the Stolen Identity and Great Impersonation Agenda tenfold.

Yet, there was more to the khakan’s decision than simple political expedience. A letter of King Joseph sent (about 958 AD) to R. Hasdai Ibn Shaprūt, foreign minister to Abd-al-Rahman, Sultan of Cordova, relates the tradition according to which the Khazars once dwelt near the “Seir Mountains.”

“And Dishon, and Ezer, and Dishan: these are the dukes of the Horites, the children of Seir in the land of Edom” (Gen. 36:21).


“Mt. Seir” … “the land of Seir” is equated with “the field of Edom.” The Mount and the Land of Seir are alternative appellations of the mountainous tract which runs along the eastern side of the Arabah, occupied by the descendants of Esau, who succeeded the ancient Horites (Ge 14:6; 36:20).”

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, SEIR


The “Seir Mountains” was the original land of Esau-Edom – “Thus dwelt Esau in mount Seir: Esau is Edom” (Gen. 36:8).

King Joseph’s letter also stated that his people sprang from Togarmah, son of Gomer, and grandson of Japheth, and the supposed ancestor of the other peoples of the Caucasus.


After Rome’s sacking of Jerusalem in 70 AD, many Idumean Edomites and Hittites had migrated north and into the old Hittite kingdom and Khazaria; by 740 AD, the land of Hittites was known as Asia Minor, which is modern Turkey.

“[The Hittites were] an ancient people, alluded to frequently in the earlier records of Israel, and also, under slightly variant names, in Egyptian records of the XVIIIth, XIXth and XXth Dynasties, and in Assyrian from about 1100 to 700 B.C.

They appear also in the Vannic cuneiform texts, and are believed to be the authors of a class of monuments bearing inscriptions in a peculiar pictographic character, and widely distributed over Asia Minor and N. Syria, around which much controversy has raged …

In the Old Testament the name of the race is written Heth (with initial aspirate), members of it being Hitti, Hittim … The race appears in two connexions:

(a) In pre-Israelite Palestine, it is resident about Hebron (Gen. xxiii. 3), and in the central uplands (Num. xiii. 29). To Joshua (i. 4) is promised “from the wilderness and this Lebanon even unto the great river, the river Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites.” The term “wilderness” here is of geographical ambiguity; but the promise is usually taken to mean that Palestine itself was part of the Hittite land before the coming of Israel; and an apostrophe of Ezekiel (xvi. 3) to Jerusalem, “thy mother (was) an Hittite,” is quoted in confirmation.

Under the monarchy we hear frequently of Hittites within the borders of Israel, but either as a small subject people, coupled with other petty tribes, or as individuals in [Israelite] service (e.g. Uriah, in the time of David). It appears, therefore, that there survived in Palestine to late times a detached Hittite population, with which Hebrews sometimes intermarried (Judges iii. 5-6; Gen. xxvi. 34) and lived in relations now amicable, now tyrannical (e.g. Hittites were made tributary bondsmen by Solomon, 1 Kings ix. 20, 21; 2 Chron. viii. 7, 8).


(b) An independent and powerful Hittite people was domiciled N. of Palestine proper, organized rather as a confederacy of tribes than a single monarchy (1 Kings x. 28; 2 Kings vii. 6). Presumably it was a daughter of these Hittites that Solomon took to wife. If the emendation of 2 Sam. xxiv. 64 … we hear of them at Kadesh on Orontes; and some minor Hittite cities are mentioned, e.g. Luz; but no one capital city of the race is clearly indicated …

So far as the Old Testament goes, therefore, we gather that the Hittites were a considerable people, widely spread in Syria, in part subdued and to some extent assimilated by Israel, but in part out of reach. The latter portion was not much known to the Hebrews, but was vaguely feared as a power in the early days of the monarchy, though not in the later pre-Captivity period. The identification of the northern and southern Hittites, however, presents certain difficulties not yet fully explained …”

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Hittites


Disparate ancient sources indicate that at one time the Hittites were one of the ancient world’s three superpowers. An Indo-European people that began to settle in what is now Turkey as early as 1900 BC, which three centuries later were powerful enough to invade Babylon. A continued expansion until they were a superpower matching both Egypt and Assyria.

The Hittite capital, Hattusa, has been excavated and the archaeology reveals a formidable and religious empire. It also dates the empire’s collapse in the early 12th century BC.

In the Bible narrative Hittites play a prominent role at key moments.

Ephron the Hittite sells Abraham the family burial ground; Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebecca, and Jacob and Leah were all buried in the Cave of Machpelah, which Abraham had purchased from Ephron (Gen. 23); Esau married Hittite women, and Rebecca, his mother, despised them (Gen. 26:34); they are frequently listed as one of Canaan’s inhabitants (e.g., Exod. 13:5; Num. 13:29; Josh. 11:3).

King David had Uriah the Hittite killed in battle so he could have his wife, the beautiful Bathsheba (2 Sam. 11); and King Solomon had Hittites among his many wives (1 Kings 10:29–11:2; 2 Chron. 1:17); and the prophet Ezekiel degrades Israel with the metaphor of a Hittite mother (Ezek. 16:3, 45).

The impression given is that many Hittites lived in the land of Canaan during the time of the patriarchs by the 54 Biblical references to them during the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah (e.g., 1 Kings 9:20; 10:29; 11:1; 2 Kings 7:6; 2 Chron. 1:17; 8:7).

The people that created the ancient superpower centred on the city of Hattusa never actually called themselves “Hittites,” but called their language “Nesite” and their land “Hatti,” referring to themselves as the”people of Hatti.”

When the kingdom collapsed, those in the former Syrian vassal states kept the culture alive, becoming the “Neo-Hittites.” Thus, while the archaeological record reveals the story of the original, old Hittites, the Bible narrative refers mostly to the “Neo-Hittites.” The ancient Hittites were the later “Turks.”

Esau had taken two Hittite wives, which displeased his parents because he had broken the Yahweh Eugenic Imperative, and sought to pollute his pristine blood with children from Canaanitish women.

While “Isaac had blessed Jacob, and sent him away to Padanaram, to take him a wife from thence; and that as he blessed him he gave him a charge, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan” (Gen.28:6), disgraced Esau he had taken his Hittite wives and moved down to the “land of Seir,” which was eventually to become known as Idumea.


Khazar king Joseph traced the ancestry of his people back to Togarmah, son of Ashkenaz, son of Japheth. The word “Turk” is a shortened form of the word “Togarmah.”


The Khazar people are an admix of Hebrew Japheth, Hittite and the Edomite genes, and later a significant input of Asiatic Mongol blood, as the Mongols had numerous clashes with the Khazars, and much cross-breeding had taken place between the two groups.

“From the earliest and very scanty notice we have of the Mongols in the history of the T’ang dynasty of China (A.D. 619–690) and in works of later times, it appears that their original camping-grounds were along the courses of the Kerulen, Upper Nonni and Argun rivers. But in the absence of all historical particulars of their origin, legend, as is usual, has been busy with their early years.

The Mongol historian Sanang Setzen gives currency to the myth that they sprang from a blue wolf; and the soberest story on record is that their ancestor Budantsar was miraculously conceived of a Mongol widow.

By craft and violence Budantsar gained the chieftainship over a tribe living in the neighbourhood of his mother’s tent, and thus left a heritage to his son. Varying fortunes attended the descendants of Budantsar, but on the whole their power gradually increased, until Yesukai, the father of Jenghiz Khan, who was eighth in descent from Budantsar, made his authority felt over a considerable area.

How this dominion was extended under the rule of Jenghiz Khan …. and when that great conqueror was laid to rest in the valley of Kilien in 1227 he left to his sons an empire which stretched from the China Sea to the banks of the Dnieper.”

1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Mongols


The Ashkanazi genealogical blueprint is a complex affair but their relationship with the biblical “Promised Land” is not, it is very simple: except for a few Edomites who had migrated up to Khazaria from Idumea, the Khazar people had absolutely no contact with either Israel or Judah. In other words, for the Judaeo-Khazars, the Ashkanazi Jews, to call themselves “Semites” is both absurd and a fraud.

An inescapable historical reality of non-Semitic origin many commentators, historians, encyclopedias, and even some of “The Jews” themselves, refer to, for example:

“Beginning with the Biblical evidence…in the beginning of the formation of the tribes of Israel they were already composed of various racial elements… we find in Asia Minor, Syria and Palestine at that time many race- the Amorites, who were blond, long-faced, and tall; the Hittites, a dark-complexioned race, probably of Mongoloid type; the Cushites a Negroid race; and many others. With all these the ancient Hebrews intermarried.”

M Fishberg, The Jews—A Study of Race and Environment (1911)




“The wide range of variation between Jewish populations in their physical characteristics and the diversity of the gene frequencies of their blood groups render any unified racial classification for them a contradiction in terms… and despite the evidence, efforts continue to be made to somehow segregate the Jews as a distinct racial entity.”

H Shapiro, The Jewish People: A Biological History, United Nations Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization “UNESCO,” (1953)




“Edom is in modern Jewry.”

The Jewish Encyclopedia Vol.5, p.41 (1925)




“It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jews’ ancestors never lived in Palestine at all, which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact.”

H G Wells, Outline of History (1919)




“Jews began to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860″

Encyclopedia Judaica Vol 10:23  (1971)




“Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”

 Jewish Almanac, A brief History of the Terms for Jew (1980)




“A great majority of the Jews today are Semites only in speech.”

E Raymond Capt, Missing Links Discovered In Assyrian Tablets, p. 93 (1985)




“Probably 95% of the persons included in these estimates of Jewish populations are Ashkenazim.”

The Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. XI p 533 (1905)




“Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”

The Jewish Encyclopedia (1943)




“Khazars (khah’-zahrz), a South Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., AD) controlled an empire which included Crimea…The Khazar royal family and aristocracy converted to Judaism during the reign of King Bulan (768-809 AD) and Judaism was thereafter regarded as the state religion…”

The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, p. 822 (1971)




“The Khazars was an ethnic group, belonging to the Turkish peoples, who, toward the end of the 2d Century of the Christian Era, had settled in the region between the Caucasus and the lower Volga and Don Rivers…At the beginning of the 8th Century, dynastic ties bound the Khazars more closely to Constantinople…

When the Byzantine Emperor, Leo, Isaurian, persecuted Jews in AD 723, many Jews found refuge in the Khazar kingdom, and their influence was so great that, around the middle of the 8th Century, the King of the Khazars and many of the nobility accepted the Jewish faith.”

New Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, p. 173 (2002)




“And without the hue and cry, ‘Anti-Semitism,’ pray what happens to the Zionist movement? Khazar conversion was not unique…

Who can say for sure that many Christian readers of this book might not in fact have a better claim, which they do not choose to exercise, to go back ‘home’ to Palestine than [Ashkanazim] Hannah Semer, Menachem Begin, or Golda Meir?”

Alfred Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection II, p. 759 (1983)



Rhineland Hypothesis vs. Khazarian Hypothesis

Science when used properly confirms Objective TruthReality, and History. This is Proper Science, conducted via the Scientific Method by Proper Scientists, which increases the store of Objective Knowledge, and greatly helps explain the vast and deeply mysterious world-around us; as well as providing labour-saving devices that make man’s lot less onerous.

Science when used improperly, especially to serve an agenda, is Improper Science or Shameful Science and conducted by Prostitute Scientists. Its purpose is not to increase Objective Knowledge, but to justify frauds. “The Science,” of COVID-19, and the “settled science” of the “Climate Emergency,” are salient examples.

Shameful Science and Statistical Misconduct underpin all of the Elite Global Parasites‘ frauds. The Globalists use Shameful ScienceStatistical MisconductFear Porn, lies, lying, Gaslighting, and audacity to foist their “consensus reality” onto the public. Used to convince people that the Masters of Illusion‘s curated “collective conscientiousness” is actually real.

Science when used properly reveals the Objective Truth, such as when used to identify the Ashkanzi Jewstrue origins. Before the advent of modern DNA science, and the “absence of all historical particulars of their origin [the Jewish Myth-makers], as is usual, [had] been busy with [the Ashkanzim‘s] early years;” refashioning it to accord with the Jewish Myth.

To make it appear that the Ashkenazim are of Hebrew Israelite bloodline when they are not, and their ancestors lived in ancient Judaea when they did not. To claim that they are Judahites and rightful heir to the Yahweh Covenants, are “God’s chosen people,” when they are most certainly not. Outrageous lies that the Jewish Myth attempts to conceal.

Much to the Jewish Myth-makers‘ great chagrin, Proper Science reveals their fraud.


DNA research science from Dr. Eran Elhaik (an Ashkanzi Jew) and associates at the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, when trying to find the Ashkenazi Jews‘ origin, and to the surprise of many, identified “Ancient Ashkenaz” in northeastern Turkey, and not in Palestine:

“We identified 367 people who claim they have two parents who are Ashkenazic Jews and we divided them into people whose parents only speak Yiddish and then everyone else … We were able to predict the possible ancestral location where Yiddish originated over 1,000 years ago — a question which linguists have debated over for many years …

North east Turkey is the only place in the world where these place names exist — which strongly implies that Yiddish was established around the first millennium at a time when Jewish traders who were plying the Silk Road moved goods from Asia to Europe wanted to keep their monopoly on trade. …

They did this by inventing Yiddish — a secret language that very few can speak or understand other than Jews. Our findings are in agreement with an alternative theory that suggests Yiddish has Iranian, Turkish, and Slavic origins and explains why Yiddish contains 251 words for the terms ‘buy’ and ‘sell’. This is what we can expect from a language of experienced merchants. …

Yiddish is such a wonderful and complex language, which was inappropriately called ‘bad German’ by both its native and non-native speakers because the language consists of made-up German words and a non-German grammar … Yiddish is truly a combination of familiar and adapted German words using Slavic grammar.”

The Times of Israel, New DNA tech traces origins of Yiddish to… Turkey. Genetic data shows speakers of Jewish language came from ancient Silk Road crossroads and may have been traders, Israeli researcher says. 23 April 2016



A study on mitochondrial DNA revealed that the female line of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry closely resembles that of Southern and Western Europe, rather than the ancient Near East. That is, conflicts with the many Jewish-myth-makers of the past that insisted that the Ashkenazim‘s ancestors were not only true Judaeans but also True Israel.

“Like Judaism, mitochondrial DNA is passed along the maternal line. Its variation in the Ashkenazim is highly distinctive, with four major and numerous minor founders … we show that all four major founders, ~40% of Ashkenazi mtDNA variation, have ancestry in prehistoric Europe, rather than the Near East or Caucasus.

Furthermore, most of the remaining minor founders share a similar deep European ancestry. Thus the great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe.

These results point to a significant role for the conversion of women in the formation of Ashkenazi communities, and provide the foundation for a detailed reconstruction of Ashkenazi genealogical history.”

Costa, M.D. et al. A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages. Nature Communications (2013).



Much to the Jewish Myth-makers‘ dismay, Proper Science easily and elegantly exposes their Great Imposture as True Israel.



Because it compliments the Jewish Myth, the so-called Rhineland Hypothesis has been the favoured explanation for the Ashkanzim‘s origins. A scenario in which “The Jews” are descended from the Israelite-Canaanite tribes, which left the Holy Land for Europe in the 7th century AD, following the Muslim conquest of Palestine, settling in lands now modern Germany.

Later, in the 15th century, a group of approximately 50,000 took it upon themselves to leave Germany, the “Rhineland,” for the east. Despite ceaseless, unjustified Christian persecution and “anti-Semitism,” as well as wars, persecution, disease, plagues, and economic hardships, “The Jews” maintained high endogamy, which ensured their population expanded rapidly to around 8 million in the early 20th century.

Only to have the “nasty Nazis” cull “six million” of them in “The Holocaust.”

The implausibility of such an event, relocating from west to east, and then a population explosion of “The Jews,” is beyond rational explanation. Hence, why modern Jewish Myth-makers explain it as a “miracle,” a case of God yet again looking after His “chosen people.”

The Rhineland Hypothesis would mean that European Jews would be very similar to each other and have a predominant Middle Eastern ancestry … which they do not.


The Khazarian Hypothesis is deemed “controversial,” even “anti-Semitic” because it conflicts with the Jewish Myth. It is a salient example of “Hate Facts” that expose “The Jews” and their frauds. It is not only the more plausible theory it is the only one Proper Science supports

It states that the Khazars (a confederation of Turkic, Iranian, and Mongol tribes who lived in what is now Southern Russia, north of Georgia and The Ukraine) converted to Pharisaism between the 7th and 9th centuries AD. These “Jewish-convert Khazars,” along with a smattering of Mesopotamian and Graeco-Roman Jews, formed the bulk of eastern Europe’s Jewish population when they fled westward, following the collapse of their empire in the 13th century.

The Khazarian Hypothesis would mean European Jews are expected to exhibit heterogeneity between different communities … which they do.

The Khazarian Hypothesis means  that “97% of the [estimated] 17 million of the world’s Jews are not descendants of Abraham.”



The Judaeo-Khazars, the bulk of modern Jewry, and the Idumean Edomites, are not Semites. That they vociferously claim that they are is part of their act, essential to their role as False Israel. Calling themselves “Semites” is essential to their “Double Life” role, part of their religious and historical charade, and modern masquerade, as the “Israel” of the Bible.

A breathtaking deception, an outrageous swindle, whereby a people that have since Cain’s time been True Israel‘s most cunning and vicious enemy, have in the last two millennia masqueraded as True Israel.

“The Jews'” Stolen Identity and Great Impersonation Agenda that has fooled the whole world (Rev. 12:9) into the delusion that they are “G-d’s chosen people.”


The charade, the deception, which began in the Garden of Eden:

“Now the Serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field, which Yahweh Elohim had made… and he said to the woman, ‘You shall not surely die.’”

Gen. 3:1-4


The Serpent people, the children of darkness, are still deceiving us today, especially the again “Lost sheep of the House of Israel;” the increasingly debauched, depraved, debased, demoralised and de-Christianised White Christian Civilisation. A massive project of infiltrationsubversionsteering, and destructionCultural Marxism subversion in which the Jewish programme of race-mixing is essential to “The Jews'” plan to wipe out the White Race.



Thus, “The Jews'” simplified genealogy coming down from Cain to Khazaria:


Cain ⇒ Kenites ⇒ Canaanites ⇒ Edomites ⇒ Idumeans ⇒ Pharisees ⇒ Sephardim ⇒ Askenazim




0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *