Luciferian Revelation of the Method: Total Enslavement of the Planet by 2030
Luciferian Revelation of the Method: Total Enslavement of the Planet by 2030
“We commit ourselves to working tirelessly for the full implementation of this Agenda by 2030.”
Luciferian United Nations declares its intention to complete the Judaeo-Freemasonry Agenda to depopulate the world and put the remnant into New World Order servitude: the New World System of Management and Control.
“Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent.”
Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.
A terrible misanthropy lies behind Agenda 21/2030’s flowery words. Its pink, fluffy Earth-centric religiosity, fuzzy philosophy, its public relations phrases and soundbites, concealing a deadly intent.
The same dark spirituality, the same perverse mind-set that corrupted the Yahweh religion making it a vehicle for Evil (corrupting Yahwehism into Pharisaism then into Judaism) operates in Agenda 21/2030’s production.
Jesus Christ denounced the Pharisees and accused them of nullifying all the Commandments of God by their tradition by “teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Matt. 15:9; Mark 7:7).
Condemning them as the embodiment of the Ahrimanically-inspired Talmud.
Christ knew what they and their anti-God religion represented in the divinely ordained plan for mankind. He knew as only God would know Pharisaism’s future role in the unfolding drama of the Evil Agenda for World Government.
Its dark, sinister presence felt most strongly in the Triumvirate of Evil: Organised Jewry, Judaeo-Freemasonry, the Judaeo-Roman Catholic Church and so-called “Judaeo-Christianity”.
So too in Communism …. Pharisaism’s modern vehicle.
Christ likened Pharisaism to:
“… whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness” (Matt. 23:27).
A profound understanding of Pharisaism’s true nature. Moreover, a prophetic statement on Communism’s true nature, and by that, everything it inspires: such as Agenda 21/2030 and “Sustainable Development.”
Agenda 21/2030’s true nature (and its indispensable rationale, the Man-Made Global Warming Fraud) is the same as the outrageous fables invented by 2nd century Pharisees. Superficially attractive yet inwardly fetid and corrupt.
Like the early Pharisees’ bitter fruits – the Talmud and Judaism – so too the fabrications of their modern contemporaries. That they all void the Laws of God and do not upholding them.
The absence of the rights of the individual is a salient example of Agenda 21/2030’s true nature, its innate evil. Nowhere does it state that the rights of the individual will be protected. It pointedly does not acknowledge the existence of God-given freedom.
Even the so-called “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” denies individuals the right of self-defence, the right of medical choice and the right of parental control over their own children.
Like all the intrusive UN human rights treaties, it is weaselling written to please the public. For example:
Article 18 upholds:
“… the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion…”
Article 19 affirms:
“… the right to freedom of opinion and expression … and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
But, Article 29 states that:
“… these rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.”
In other words, “rights” and “freedoms” are privileges awarded by UN largess. Moreover, revoked at the UN’s will. In short, they do not apply to those who would question the UN or its policies.
“Rights” and “freedoms” are conditioned on compliance to the New World Order. The same as the Legal Philosophy of Terror in Stalin’s Russia.
Herein lies the great dichotomy between God-given “unalienable rights” and Government issued “Legal Rights”.
Between the freedom and slavery: ruled and the rulers: the people and the elite: the Person and Government.
The Person
Western neo-liberal jurisprudence, “the Law”, identifies two “persons”
- “natural-person”
- “artificial-person”
A “natural-person” is defined as “a human being that has the capacity for rights and duties”.
Here, “capacity” means the “ability”, but not the “obligation” for “rights and duties”.
Modern Government has created many different types of Artificial-Person, each with different “duties”, for example:
- Taxpayer
- Resident
- Driver
- Voter
- Citizen
- Homeowner
- Officer
Modern Government invent a system to control sovereign citizens by consent. An invisible control matrix that would not violate a person’s fundamental human rights, but would allow the Government to “own” everything produced or possessed by its citizens.
A form of control by consent.
In this sense Modern Government is a Corporation and the Person (sovereign citizen) an “artificial person”.
A technique used by all Modern Governments, which are simply a grandiose legal entity devoid of human emotion, feelings and cannot be hurt.
An “artificial person” is subject to the whims of his creator and must obey it. Hence, the CORPORATION can enslave or completely dominate him.
In Western neo-liberal jurisprudence, capital letters are used to represent CORPORATIONS and COMPANIES. A Modern Government created “artificial person” is identified in capital letters e.g. JOHN DOE. The name of a”natural-person” is represented by lower case letters.
The Government (CORPORATION) created a JOHN DOE CORPORATION for every JOHN DOE (“artificial person”) .
A CORPORATION needs a business number in order to do business. So too the “artificial person”. Government assigns a unique business number to each JOHN DOE it creates i.e. the Birth Certificate Number or Social Security Number.
A mechanism not only used to track the “artificial person’s” activities but also allow to claim ownership on all the “artificial person’s” property and income.
Government requires an “Officer” of the CORPORATION to run the day-to-day activities, a position requiring a “Contract” since the “Officer” will be held accountable for the CORPORATION’s actions. Here, Government tricks John Doe into becoming the “Officer” for the JOHN DOE CORPORATION by a simple expedient: obliging him to sign such contracts as Driver’s Licence, Passports, Bank Accounts etc.
Income Tax is a special case. An annual contract whereby the Government decrees that John Doe is the Legal Representative for the officer of the JOHN DOE CORPORATION and the only contract involved is the annual Income Tax Return; wherein John Doe gives his agreement as “Officer” of JOHN DOE for the previous year.
A great deception. Manufaturing consent by continuous contracting.
John Doe does not know that he is an “artificial person” incorporated at birth as JOHN DOE CORPORATION. Nor does he realise that he is its “Officer” and must follow the Government rules imposed upon JOHN DOE.
Herein lies the confusion.
John Doe (“natural person”) believes that he is JOHN DOE (“artificial person”) and has to forfeit his rights (“unalienable rights”) and duties (“Legal Rights”) upon demand by the Government and its officials.
The Government
“Government” is the ruling power in a political society. A determinate body whose commands the rest of the community are bound to obey. In the theory of community, it is a sovereign body of the government of the country, and the varieties which may exist in its constitution.
Essentially, “Government” is an attempt to create a safe society. Men elect Governments to protect and uphold their “unalienable rights” and their responsibilities, “duties”, to their fellow man.
There are three standard forms of government.
Since Aristotle, political writers are unanimous in their classification of government forms. They identify three types:
- Governed by one man, or by a number of men (Tribe leader, chieftain, king, emperor, dictator etc.)
- Small in proportion to the whole number of men in the state (tribal elders, aristocracy, Oligarchy etc.)
- Large in proportion to the whole number of men in the state (Parliament, Senate, congress “The Party” etc)
Government may be a Monarchy, an Aristocracy, a Democracy.
A Government’s determining quality is the numerical relation between a government’s constituent members and the state’s population.
Again following Aristotle, Government’s moral quality is usually determined as being “good” or “depraved”. For example:
- The “good government” of one (Monarchy) corresponds to the “depraved” form (Tyranny)
- The “good government” of many (Commonwealth) corresponds to the “depraved form” (Democracy).
The Depraved Forms’ main characteristic is that the rulers act unjustly where their own interests are concerned.
The worst depraved form is Tyranny, the next Oligarchy and the least bad Democracy.
Therefore, a “good government” is one in which as much as possible is left to the Laws, and as little as possible to the governor’s Will.
Aristotle warned of the error to think that any one of the depraved forms is better than any other. They are all corrupt and deleterious to both individual and civic well-being.
Any form of Government, because it is a human construct, is infinitely corruptible. Good government is a rare historical phenomenon.
Modern forms of government are no different. They have been constructed to serve the governors’ Will and not the governed’s well-being. The subtle difference from past Depraved Forms is that modern government tricks the governed into compliance with their Will and so secures their servitude.
Governments and other “regulatory bodies” have created a sophisticated system in which people are tricked into following their rules and to be subservient to them.
A Dark Power has influenced and manipulated governments, in the Western World especially, to adopt this management and control system. A system that has subverted the concept of “good government”.
Judaeo-Freemasonry’s agenturs have worked to created a system that tricks people into thinking they must serve Government, where in fact Governments were established to serve them, the people.
They have succeed in the lateral inversion of “good government” and “depraved government”: making good depraved and the depraved good. That “good government” is the tyrant’s rule and depraved government is the individual claiming that his God-given unalienable rights trumps the Governor’s Will.
Succeeding in turning Natural Moral Order on its head.
One of the scam’s most powerful tricks is the creation of the concept of the “artificial-person”. The means whereby Government and other regulators have tricked people into thinking they must follow their rules.
A from of manufactured consent in which the “natural person” believes and acts as the “artificial-person” (i.e. a CORPORATION), an entity that is not them. An illusion created at a person’s birth.
When the Natural Person awakens to his slavery by stealth. To his servitude by manufactured consent and questions it in anyway. In the Government’s eyes, he is in breach of contract as an Artificial Person and it pursues him mercilessly.
Modern Depraved Governments masquerading as Liberal Democracies need to keep their enslaved quiescent until the New World Order’s establishment when all pretences to freedom and liberty are dropped.
For this reason, to give an impression fundamental human rights are not violated, they provided recognition in law for another legal entity called a “natural-person”. A legal entity that simply means a human-being with most of his fundamental rights still intact.
At the moment, interaction with law means either representing oneself as an Artificial Person or a Natural Person … at the moment one still has the choice.
The concept of an “artificial-person”, a legally obligated entity appearing to be you but is not you, is deliberately made arcane. A devilish device contrived to enslave by consent.
An elaborate, deceitful scheme contrived to deceive people into thinking they are obligated by government statutes and regulations and by that to the Governors’ whims.
A scam designed to manufacture consent of the people by continuous contracting and to make them accountable to all Government rules and regulations, for example:
- Pay taxes on almost every aspect of life
- Obtain licences to do fundamentally lawful activities
- Register all personal affairs (i.e. marriage, business, vehicles, children etc.).
Natural Rights and Legal Rights
In modern society, an individual has two types of rights: Natural Rights and Legal Rights.
- Natural Rights are God-given and cannot be denied or restricted by a government or an individual. Rationalists and other atheists consider Natural Rights to be granted via “natural law”
- Legal Rights are granted by governments or legal systems. As such, they are infinitely malleable, and can be modified, restricted or repealed.
The Ancient Greeks first discussed the concept of a Natural Law, establishing the existence of specific natural rights in their philosophy. Ideas the Roman philosopher Cicero referred to. It also ipso facto appeared in the Bible and was developed by medieval Scholastics.
Then used during the Age of Enlightenment to oppose Absolutism and the Divine Right of Kings theory. Its fruition at the American Revolution’s dawn in John Locke’s writings and then the Declaration of Independence itself.
Locke’s democratic principle argued for in his Second Treatise, although novel at the time, was in parts anticipated by Aquinas, Bodin, Grotius and Hooker. Its guiding principle is simple: Civil rulers (kings, emperors, representative government etc.) hold their power not absolutely but conditionally.
Why?
Government is essentially a moral trust, forfeited if the trustees do not fulfil the conditions. A situation presupposing an original and necessary law of nature or reason … Natural Law.
An abstraction, since no historical proof exists in which power was formally entrusted to rulers by the conscious and deliberate action of the ruled. Locke’s Treatises on Government were meant to not only vindicate the Convention parliament and the English Revolution but also refute the ideas of absolute monarchy held others (Hobbes, Filmer etc.).
Locke’s Treatises on Government are classics of English constitutional law and polity, used as inspiration by others. They were intrinsic to the American Declaration of Independence’s argument.
The Declaration of Independence’s intention, which was authored primarily by Thomas Jefferson, was as a statement, the rationale, for the separation from Britain.
The language used was nurtured in the Age of Enlightenment and its direct influence being Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1689) a glorious argument in defence of the right of ultimate sovereignty in the people.
The American Declaration of Independence’s authors spoke of people being endowed with “unalienable Rights” such as “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” thereby confirming their belief in the existence of “natural rights.”
Confirming their belief in universal adherence to the “laws of nature” as key to civilisation’s advancement.
Echoing Locke, who wrote that all people are born with God-given “inalienable” rights, “natural rights”, which rulers and governments can neither grant nor revoke, including “life, liberty, and property.”
That any Ruler or Government is not the source of individual rights… God is …
A Universal truth Agenda 21/2030’s authors deny. Who take the despot’s side and declare human rights a privilege granted by an absolute authority. In their case, the United Nations and the demands of its “Sustainable Development Goals.”
When Agenda 21/2030’s thin veneer of benevolence is peeled back, both an intense anti-human, anti-God hatred and a concentrated evil are revealed.
So too a time-table for action.
The despots-in-waiting have given warning of their intentions. They have even put a timetable to them. A massive journey of reorganisation whose way-points are “Global Goals”. An Evil Agenda euphemistically called “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”.
2050 was the intended completion date. The time when most ordinary people had been corralled in the painless gulags euphemistically called “Smart Cities” and the deserted earth “re-wilded” into vast“Wilderness Areas.”
A perfectly planned schedule now changed. The completion date is now 2030.
Why?
The New World Order realises time is of the essence. Time is now short for them and their Evil Agenda. They realise that their grand illusion created by them as Masters of Illusion is beginning to dissolve.
The mask is slipping revealing the true and cruel visage of the New World Order’s leaders hell-bent on completing the total enslavement of man under their New Global Governance.
Gentle reader, we live in fateful times and Divine Powers have ordained a movement exposing the identities and corruption of the sinister New World Order’s leaders.
The human agents of Evil … Organised Evil’s agentur … who have been plotting mankind’s enslavement not only in the West but also throughout the world.
The New World Order realises a new consciousness is emerging culminating in a worldwide epiphany, whereby ordinary men and women, the good people, begin to see, to become informed, to have the ability to discern between the leaders who have their best interests at heart and those who are truly wicked and evil.
The New World Order realises time is short for its very existence as people awake to the realisation that a cult, a Luciferian Brotherhood, has ascended to power and has taken Western Civilisation by the throat and is slowly strangling it to death.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!